That'll actually be really nice to have, I would welcome the feature if it ever gets implemented. it gets quite tiring if you have 15 different versions of the same project when you think about it.
thatguyisop
@thatguyisop
User of fxdreema since 2024, have made 6 working strategies using this amazing web tool
Latest posts made by thatguyisop
-
RE: [FR] Version Control Historyposted in Bug Reports
-
RE: No Position Nearby - Question about the Time Filterposted in Questions & Answers
Yep, the project i have shared does exactly what you just described : splitting the 1% risk to 3 (0.33%) whilst also calculating the gap distance.
Though, i just use a simple TP for this (percent of SL). I'll leave the customized TP to whoever wants to use this project as a base.
My current conclusion : The No Position Nearby Block is incredibly unstable, any usage of it should be minimized

Thanks for helping out!
-
RE: No Position Nearby - Question about the Time Filterposted in Questions & Answers
Sorry it took a bit, I have concluded that the Pips away from open price and the No Position Nearby block is incredibly unstable

I did an extremely different system altogether at the end.
My use case is to be used as a DCA but with a determined riskExample use case :
Say i want to Risk Only 1%
But my tolerance is 3 position with a gap of (X) Distance with a Max SL Distance of (Y)How do i make it so my TOTAL risk is 1% for all 3 positions with (X) Distance if it hits (Y) SL?
Here is the link to the project :
https://fxdreema.com/shared/9OMggdQ8e -
RE: No Position Nearby - Question about the Time Filterposted in Questions & Answers
I did, and this configuration is cursed
it is the exact configuration that caused a huge difference in PF due to entry doubling + somesort of early passing that happens randomly..
I did this instead though.. from 20% difference in 1min ohlc and tickdata to only about 3% - 5%

-
Question How to Implement Group Trail Stop From Average Weighted Priceposted in Questions & Answers
Is there a way to effectively make a group trailing stop? Where the Trailing start and stop is based on ATR * Multiplier?
For example :
I currently have 3 positions that is a buy only1st position is on 150 with 0.1 Lots
2nd position is on 145 with 0.2 Lots
3rd position is on 140 with 0.3 lotsALL of the SL of the 3 positions are on 130
The average weighted open price of these positions are : 143.33Is there a way for the SL trailing to start after current price has reached (ATR * Multiplier) from Average price with a stop level of (ATR * Multiplier) whilst still referencing the Average Weighted Price of the 3 positions?
Many thanks.
-
RE: No Position Nearby - Question about the Time Filterposted in Questions & Answers
I simply need for it to detect if there is no position nearby by x pips, if there isn't any position, the block passes
The problem is, this time filter thing affects the PF of 1 min ohlc and tick data by 0.20 (wayy too large) and i don't know why
-
No Position Nearby - Question about the Time Filterposted in Questions & Answers

Can someone tell me what the time filters do containing Time 1 and Time 2 in the No Position Nearby block?
Like what is it? what does it do? -
RE: Profitable test results on Falcon and Condor, and forward testing looking goodposted in General Discussions
@Julianrob Nice result on the Quant Analyzer! how is the progress on the live test so far? and is this an ORB-like strategy?
