I looks that it's there, but it's probably not.
In the beginning I started to add blocks to MT4 and to MT5 separatedly, and I was using different ID names for some blocks sometimes. For example NoTrades vs NoPositions. But I had no idea to allow mixing MT4 and MT5 blocks, back then there was no even copy-paste. Now I'm still not 100% into that idea, to mix MT4 and MT5 blocks. I suggest to remove those blocks that are missing and replace them. And also check conditions if something is used in MT5 that is not available in MT4.

Someone may help me to solve this problem?. I can try to explain by an example :
I open the fxdreema program and insert a new position BUY at the price now : 1.3050 with stop loss 1.3030 (up this point is ok : no problem).

IMMEDIATELY (not after) I want insert a pending order at the same price 1.3050, in the case of the previous order to be closed at 1.3030 by stop loss : IS POSSIBLE OR NOT???

And is possible that at the price of 1.3050, to be AUTOMATICALLY open a buy order every time the order will be closed at 1.3030 by stop loss? Which is the block (the format) in FXDREEMA?

Thank you very much again in advance for your kind and important cooperation.

Now i have idea. its simple. run the second condition only if bid price was under first low. 😆

They show how to generate report at the end of the backtest, but in the middle of the backtest how to make MT4 to show you that there was a withdraw, to make changes to the Balance/Equity chart, to make functions like AccountBalance() and AccountEquity() to return correct values. I don't know, if I have to do tricks with MQL4 and MQL5, I will rather program a whole new backtester. But this is something bih and I already think and work for different kind of project 🙂

"Check if trade was closed in this bar"

Yes something like that, but this may work also i will try it 🙂

"check last trade's close time with For each Closed Trade (set Not more than n trades to 1) -> check age (set it to close time)."

I don't know, this strategy is not mine and it does not say anything special about TP. It's not that it can't be placed. Now it closes on profit only in the next oversold/overbought.

If you think that this is quickly... I'm not forcing myself to answer as soon as possible lately, I can delay it for hours, but also I don't like to have too many pending questions.

That close trades block will pass anyway, even if there is nothing closed. It's there to clear the Sell before going to Buy and clear the Buy before going to Sell. It's because something should close those trades, they have no SL and no TP. Well, this is the example I give, this is the general example of buy-sell-buy-sell on reverse situations, if you know what I mean.

Thanks bro

So you have to determine the lowest low and then figure out where it is the previous and next low around it? I think we are going too deep here, an EA can check some basic things and do some basic calculations, but for special calculations they created indicators. So I can suggest to find some indicator.
By the way some people are working with ZigZag (I don't know why, I don't like it) and I added some calculations to get it's Xth top/low. Find it in the list of built in indicators. It is a custom indicator, but it comes with MT so it's almost built in 🙂

Bro, how you doing? Have you figured it out yet? If not let me know and I'll see if I can guide you through it

ok thanks 🙂

that's it, only for that ea. It's working now - thank you! 🙂

If you use some indicator in a block, no matter what the block is (Condition or something else) and that indicator exists in MetaTrader, then in backtester it will appear after the backtest ends, or in demo/real it will be used but it will not automatically appear on the chart.
So, in short, when you use an indicator and there is no error with it, it only appears in backtesting after the backtest ends, otherwise it's used but it's not visible. Even in visual backtesting if you want to see it you have to add it manually.

Also i can suggest the block "Once per bar", if needed. It adds different behaviour when it is placed before or after the conditions. You know, indicators seems very simple until you start to think how to add them into an EA 🙂 You think there is only one way to use it and then you realize that there are more ways than you wanted 😕 Well, this is in case you work on the current candle.

Buffer 0 appears to be the value, no matter if the histogram is green or red
Buffer 1 is the value of the green histogram, and when the histogram is red the value is 0
Buffer 2 is the value of the red histogram, and when the histogram is green the value is 0

So the buffers looks fine and it depends on what is needed. If you want to detect the moment when the histogram turns into green, then something like this: http://fxdreema.com/shared/jjiYO4yBc

Mmm this code comes from the indicator, I found it here: http://codebase.mql4.com/source/39163
Are you sure the problems is in the indicator, and if yes, are all the input parameters fine? By the way I'm not really good with custom indicators 🙂

There is a better way to describe something technical:

This happens This happens This does not
...
with less words as possible, the most important words.

And even better way - with screenshots! I can suggest this program: http://app.prntscr.com/

It seems that some people get it well, others don't. Yes, no programming is needed, at least not in the sence of learning a programming language and writing text commands, but some aspects of programming are still needed - you must have good logic thinking. If you don't get it i see 2 options - find a programmer (with all the possible problems included) or find a ready-made EA, probably something that is paid (with all the possible problems included).

ok..Hoped it could be dont without any programing. This is over my head 😞

Excellant