Thanks for the input 🙂

I want to mention that I prefer to answer small questions rather than building whole projects...
So... to see what is going on, I use "Draw arrow" block - connect it after some block and you will se where is this block passing (many arrows will be drawn).
I created block "Logic points tester" for that reason actually, so it can be used as well. I only found myself using "Draw arrow", but it's a personal preference.
To see values in realtime - "Levels tester..." block is good.

By the way I meant connection 1 to 5, not 23 to 5 🙂 Now what you have is... maybe the same as before with less blocks.

"Buy now" creates a new trade with given parameters, but that's all. To close trade by condition, on a separate group of blocks place something like "Condition -> Close each trade". If needed - "Once per bar" or other filter blocks.
Highest and lowest values are somewhere in "Market Properties"

If you ask for "Candlestick pattern", it's not very likely for me to update it. But there is that Relative mode where things are in %.
If you ask for "Single candle template", there are % options for wicks already. About the body size... it's the difference between the total size and size of the wicks, but I can think about the body size.

Currently I keep MT4 and MT5 separated because they have major difference in the way they operate with trades (positions). The reason why someone will want to create an EA is that he wants to use that robot to place some trades automatically, so this is the most important functionality. In other words, even if you create project for MT4 and you save it as .ex5... it will not work as expected and you have to change the trading logic. The same if you have project for MT5 and you save it as .ex4. It's not that 1-2 blocks are different, it's that you have different trading logic at all.
And I can tell you - it's always better and easier and faster to start something from scratch instead of trying to fix it on most of it's parts.

Don't "panic" so much :)) It's normal to forget some EA working on another chart. This happens to me often, even when I use the Tester most of the time. Actually backtesting helps for this to happen, because there is new chart created on every backtest, and eventually you have tons of charts and you don't remember where EAs are and if there are any somewhere 🙂 So... closing all charts should be enough.

Yes. Magic number, SL and trade type (buy or sell) are properties of the trade and they are not lost. Trailing stop uses these properties, so it will work with them when EA is "smiling".
Even a problem can come from this - if you have two EAs with same MagicStart (Magic Number = MagicStart + Group), they can both control the same trades.

well, let's say you want to offset the trailing stop so it starts after the open price. A fixed value won't work for all symbols, wouldn't I need a dynamic value? How would I do this?

thank you. this helps alot

If I'm not missing something, I think this will work:

Condition - Once a day - Start trades loop - (in loop) Modify

This is modifying stops once a day when some condition occurs.

I think I get the Idea. Thanks

Moving average is trend indicator, stochastic is oscillator. Moving average has values that depends on the price and on the market, stochastic is in between 0 and 100. Both indicators are from different nature, they have very different values, these cannot be crossed.

The number of digits is something different than minimum lot. Every bloker has minimum lot that you can send, and in your case it's probably 0.1. You can actually try to send 0.01 lot manually... it should be impossible, I think.

"pips" uses the point format defined in options, so it depends.
search for "double toPips", I can tell where exactly it is located because what functions to be used inside the project depends on the project itself - only the ones needed are places in the code.

Yes, twice. But it will take effect on all places where timeframe is defauld - Current.

I found a workaround by using formulas instead of variables but here is an example before implementing workaround. Project id: mt4-1808

I can see what you are trying.

You don't need to use "AND" block at all, this block is to make parallel blocks to behave as serial, but it's much better to just connect them one after another.

Then, under "on Tick" blocks are executed on every tick, and every block does what it has to do once. "Sell now" creates a new trade, and goes to the next blocks... but next blocks are executed only once, after the sell trade is created.

There are many ways to do this, but this can do the trick: http://fxdreema.com/shared/P2Wh31uac

Ok think I get it now.. I needed condition block for stochastic and change right side to value for comparison it looks like.

Thanks!

I'm sure, but at the moment the source code that any block generates does not depend on the order of input parameters, it's hard-coded 🙂

just thinking, is there a way instead of creating a condition block for each market to create 3 condition blocks: 1) if market is 5 decimal places (that would cover EURUSD, AUDUSD, GBPUSD, etc and micro variations) 2) if market is 3 decimal places (that would cover JPYUSD & SILVER and micros) 3) if market is 2 decimal places (GOLD and GOLDmicro)?