This is what you have for the Sell part: http://prntscr.com/c7hqm3
Guess what... if RSI is lower than 16, then it's lower than 45 as well. If both Conditions (10 and 13) are both true, you can imagine that they does not exists.

Maybe you can use "Once per bar" somewhere. Or maybe you want to use x< or x> in some Condition.

Yes, it seem all right. Let you know in case of bug! Thanks

"1,2" was not possible in "on Trade". I think that it works now.

A moment ago i sent an e-mail with attachments.
This problem applies to any ea that I build.

Regards

Przemek

Who knows. It's interesting that both PSAR fail - the built-in and the one that is as a custom indicator. I think that it's something with the indicator itself, but I don't know exactly how it works. And it's also very hard to find the reason of the problem when the problem happens very rarely 🙂

thanks,

I added something new there. You can check if it works.

I can see in your projects, but you have only 2 and there is no time filter block in them. So yes, provide more information 🙂

Yes, in fxDreema you define the size of one pip. In these settings you can say to the EA to convert certain points format to pips. I remember that back then in MetaTrader they never used "pips" as a term, they used the word "points". So, by "points" I mean the real difference between two prices, like these 500 points in 5 digit brokers. By "pips" I imagine 0.0001 in most USD currency pairs, no matter if the broker is 4 or 5 digit.

http://www.investopedia.com/terms/p/pip.asp

This is true. Here is something I wrote before - post/11013

I don't have problems with this: https://fxdreema.com/shared/4IlVstyzc
Give me EA that contains 2-3 blocks, only what is needed for me to see the problem. I can see your project, but... too big for me to investigate. I just need small project that will show the problem when I put it to my tester. When I have this, I will see the problem and I will fix the problem 🙂

Yes, I think the same... never happened something like this....

Many thanks.. let you know!
Regards.

There was a problem when no stops are used. I fixed this problem.

Looks like you've nailed it Dreema.

Thanks!!! 🙂

By the way, by creating this builder and giving the ability for non-programmers to build EA's is absolutely wonderful.
Well done indeed!! 😄

For some reason blocks with titles containing this strange looking "o" with something above it does not work. I will suggest to use the normal latin letter "o" instead

I don't know why people prefer to connect blocks like this. The idea of these "Bucket" blocks is to:

Select some group of trades. Because the term "Group" is used somewhere else, I decided to use the word "Bucket". After you have those trades selected, get some value out of them - their profit, count, whatever.

And the idea is that 2) **must **happen after 1). But for some reason if there are blocks that must run in certain order, people don't connect them in any order. Insted, probably because it looks more pretty, they connect blocks in this parallel fashion. When blocks are connected like this, then their numbers matter and this is the problem.

I don't want to turn the value from EMPTY_VALUE to 0 only because of this example. As I said, there is a reason why I use EMPTY_VALUE. What I can do is to turn EMPTY_VALUE to the minimum lot size in the functions that calculate lot sized. Because 0 is nothing, but EMPTY_VALUE also represents nothingness, although it's value is a huge positive number 🙂

__This is what I tried:
http://prntscr.com/bmqdi4
And this is how it worked:
http://prntscr.com/bmqdbh

I got some modifications. I don't know what does not work. I need more information, what I am missing here?

shafqat, I never tried the built-in trailing stop, but the block should work. There are so many settings, because people wanted them.[/quote:3pfe8g0u]
thank sir you resolve my problem......now point clear..Thanks alot

You use "Indicator rise" and "Indicator fall" with 0 pips for rise or fall. What is the idea here?

So you have slippage. I programmed the EAs in a way, so if slippage happens, to modify SL/TP after that. The idea is that if you want SL to be 100 pips from the open price, it's going to be 100 pips from the open price, even if the open price happens to be different that the price that was requested. If this happened, you would be able to see "modify" immediately after the trade is created.

Thanks Daniel that tip helped.