fxDreema

    • Register
    • Login
    • Search
    • Back to the main page
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Search

    backtester and volume

    Questions & Answers
    2
    4
    959
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • D
      dscoles last edited by

      I have attempted to include volume from a number of different indicators to my algorithm. However, it appears that during backtesting none of the buffers contain any values. I also see that the FXDREEMA standard indicator list excludes volumes. Perhaps this is because volume values cannot be synthesized during backtesting? Is this "to be expected?" I am sort of stumped.

      Thanks,

      Dwight

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • fxDreema
        fxDreema last edited by

        I'm not really aware of what Volume means on the chart. As I remember, there are 2 types of Volume in MetaTrader 5, which adds to my confusion. So I don't know what can bewrong with this really. What I can suggest is to use "Indicator tester" to check what the indicator is giving to the EA.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • D
          dscoles last edited by

          I find it humorous that the industry consideres the concept of "volume" so difficult to define. It is only one of the most fundamental of questions one (at least a newbie) might ask... How many pips of transactions occurred in a given bar for that currency pair? In any case, when reading on the internet, no one really seems to know.

          The indicators that I have found (e.g., BetterVolume1.5) all show zero in the tester for all of the buffers. However, when
          running in "live" mode with the DATA window open, the buffers certainly contain data. Like I said, I assume that there is some form of data mining that happens in "real time" that is not accounted for in the tester related to "real" tick data vs. the calculated data used per minute in the tester. I am just a newbie, but this is my assumption from what I can find on the internet.

          I will test that portion of my algorithm when I shift to real-time demo mode.

          Thanks,

          Dwight

          ......
          BetterVolume 1.5 new.mq4

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • fxDreema
            fxDreema last edited by

            I can't confirm the problem with backtesting, I have positive values for all buffers when backtesting in Visual mode and also in non-visual mode. I also have values of 0, but not all the time and everywhere.
            Volume is part of the history data, it's a property of each candle in the given timeframe. Maybe you don't have this part of the data in your history data? What do you have here? http://prntscr.com/7hkg0g

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • 1 / 1
            • First post
              Last post

            Online Users

            M
            A
            M
            W
            E
            G
            K
            E
            A

            16
            Online

            146.7k
            Users

            22.4k
            Topics

            122.6k
            Posts

            Powered by NodeBB Forums | Contributors