strategy result .. whats your comments !!?
-
-
my comment is with a 61% modelling quality, that results are a lie.
Even under 90% I recently changed over to MT5 and im quickly finding that basically anything I created in MT4 isn't as good as I thought because the data is much more accurate on MT5. Maybe thats just me and my case and how my EA's work however.
-
truly, go back and figure out how to do the testing to get better quality because all results are not going to be very close to accurate.
-
good point .. i will test it in MT5 and will see the result .. thanks
-
@jsauter86 i will try to test it at tick data suite if result at mt5 not same as in mt4
-
@jsauter86 Agreed. These results are not reliable at all. Do more backtesting with better quality data.
-
Getting 29 lucky trades is very easy, no matter how accurate your data is. You should get at least 200 trades for some statistical validity, 2000 even better.
Need small help? Tag me in your post
Need big help? https://www.fiverr.com/big_algo/automate-your-winning-strategy-in-mql4-or-mql5 -
@l-andorrà im working on that to have a more reliable test result .. thanks
-
@roar 30 trades is logic here because when accurate certain conditions occurred .. EA will operate .. used it manually and it worked with me like more than 90% thats why i program it here .. but even though having low modeling quality is not accepted and will work on it too .. thanks
-
@roar well, i dont know about that many lol...what if you only take 52 trades in a year?
-
@jsauter86 the result here is for 5 months at one instrument pair .. if i use it at other two or more instrument that has almost the same wave notation (definition we use to explain each instrument behavior ) that would be satisfying for me and many other
-
do you have a maximum draw down target or are you hoping that by sheer numbers of trades, hoping to be in the right direction will keep your account above 0?
