How to count candles only after the trade?
-
How to count candles only after the trade?
When referring candle 1 candle 2, 3 candle, candle 4, I want it only after the trade, ie if there was trade in sailing 2, I want to be excluded reading candle and candle 3 4, how do I?
Thanks in advanced
Good trades

-
I don't understand this request really
More details? -
What I want is the following:
My system will study the previous candles, for example, 1,2,3,4,5,6,7 ... But if there has opened a trade, the leituraque is backwards of trade should be ignored, ie, should read 1,2,3,4,5,6,7 but rather the candles that are ahead of the trade , if there are, they may only be the candle 1 and 2, for example, this case should ignore the candle, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7, because they are behind the open trade?
Unable to explain to me?
-
I still can't understand you, Google translate is not very good

Can you explain the strategy in steps, like this, as simple as possible:- do this
- do this...
-
yes it is true that my English is poor and I use google translator , sorry .
I'll try to explain ...
I have a strategy , a reading of the candles :
1 - 1 reads the candle , the candle reads 2nd , 3rd , 4th ... 7th ...
2 - If you find the desired signal , makes the trade ...
3 - When to close the trade , reads contrary , but as it has a 7 th candles , will read all the candles behind the candle " 0 " , ie , 1st , 2nd , 3rd , 4th ... 7th but what I read is that yes but only to the candle that made ββthe trade , it should not always read the complete cycle of 7 candles ... So if you have already spent 7 candles since the trade was opened ... If the trade was opened on 2nd candle , the reading cycle of 7 candles should be ignored from the 3rd candle ...
if the trade was in the candle 2 , reads only candle 1 and 2 , ignores 3 , 4,5,6 and 7 ... ;
If the trade was in the candle 8 , then you should read the entire cycle , the candle 1 , the candle reads 2 , 3 Reads candle , candle 4 , 5 reads the candle , the candle reads 6 , 7 including the candle reads ...
Unable to explain ... ?
Thank you.
-
I think this is too complex and specific to be made with available blocks. Maybe some specific block with custom code, in theory it's not impossible, but it will not be elegant to do things like this with blocks because there are many small calculations and conditions.