fxDreema was updated... obviously

[fxDreema]

I have no idea how any of your strategies should work. I'm not sitting here investigating people's strategies. For me those two projects are equal, so just tell me what is not working exactly.

[ramsay09]

The strategy itself is irrelevant. The point is that adding and removing funktionality (blocks ect.) is leading to not expected EA's behaviour or in other words said: if I add blocks and variables and remove them again it could happen that the EA has different functionality as before the modification or some not used var/cont are not deleteable. There is a kind of instability and this is not good for big projects.

The point in my last posting is that the two mentioned versions are visually (blocks, variables, ect.) the same but the wrong version has a different functionality. Before the update there were not problems at all.

[fxDreema]

I don't even have some "Koiler..." indicator for these strategies. Just tell me what's wrong, which block doesn't work as expected.

[ramsay09]

I don't know everything I have added and deleted but the wrong-appendix version should not contain the following:

blocks: 11205752 - 11205754 and 11205743,
constants: ma_period and increased_lot_factor,
variables: buy_lot_factor and sell_lot_factor

But the point is why could that happen? There is no visible deviation between v2.8 and v2.8_wrong.

[fxDreema]

I can't find these blocks, constants and variables in the -wrong EA It is still a mystery for me how you can have blocks with such numbers

[ramsay09]

these blocks were from my v2.8_backup. Deleting these blocks, removing some previousely added and klicking in history to undo the changings was leading to v2.8_wrong. Repeating that was not leading to EA's wrong behaviour this time. Ok, lets call that a mystery and hope that doesn't happan again. I better don't touch history. I still don't feel comfortable with that.

Don't misunderstand me... you are doing a great job here and fxdreema is a very helpfull product in creating EA's.

[fxDreema]

I just can't understand you most of the time. Look at this topic with 27 pages where I was asking you probably the same amount of questions as you did, and my job here is to answer to questions viewtopic.php?t=2556

I don't know what projects people are doing, I'm not looking at them and I believe that people also prefer their projects to be more private. So, when smebody shows me his project, I know exactly nothing about it. I don't know his project in the same way as he knows it. He knows every variable, every constant, every block, while for me his project is just some colorful paint with no meaning at all. Even if I decide to investigate and understand the project, then I forget about it in a day. So if someone says to me "Here is my project, there is a problem in it, go there and find it", this also means nothing to me. It's much better is he says to me "When I do this, this and this, that happens and I don't want it to happen. I use MT4, Chrome on Windows 8."

[ramsay09]

Well, I allways try to explain "things" as good and clear as possible but "things" are sometimes complex and very special. But it is ok I am quite satisfied with my progress in developing my EA. I will change my browser and will use chrome now. I am also using mt4 and Windows 8. Maybe there was something happend to firefox...

By the way, I am surprised about the high klicks (3400+) on our/my thread, are you refering to some questions to not to answere the same question again and again? It's definitely not me and I am the only one who is developing the EA.

[fxDreema]

I mentioned MT4, Chrome and Windows just as an example, as information that is good to be included to the question (when needed).

Almost all the time I am answering the same questions again and again. I don't know why this topic has to many views, but I can find other multi-paged topics with many views. Look at page 13, the topic which is written in other language (bulgarian), it has 26 pages and 9000+ views