Example explanation is inconsistent

[drkim226]

Example 1: Waiting for blocks to pass: Two crossovers
https://fxdreema.com/demo/mt4-wait-crossovers

Example 2: Wrong: Closing rule
https://fxdreema.com/demo/mt4-wrong-closing-rule

It's said in the first example that it's be waiting for block to pass.
However, in the second example,the condition block following "buy now" block is executed only once in the first tick.
This explanation is contradictory to the above first example explanation.

Please explain me for this.

Thanks

[Implosion]

The main point here is that a block only passes when it executes. So if you buy a trade it stays in the trade and nothing passes through the "buy now" block until the conditions are right for a "buy now". So you would add things like comments to the bottom of a "buy now block". You have to remember the first block in any FXDreema sequence is exposed to the flow of ticks from the broker and every block must be connected to one other block to work. You may have many, many first blocks on a FXDreema Tick page.

[Xolasoqashe]

@implosion Where can I get a course of learning FxDreema?

[Xolasoqashe]

@drkim226 Where can I get a course of learning FxDreema?

[drkim226]

@implosion
Firstly, thanks for your reply.
I know the block can't be executed without connection.
The point of my question is that it's not consistent of the logic , for those two example.

In the descripton of first example,
" Now the first Condition will not run again until the second Condition passes. Instead, the second Condition will run on each tick until it passes and gives turn to the first Condition again."

I can't understand above sentence.
I think every tick should check the first condition.

Pls explain more.. Thanks

[Implosion]

" Now the first Condition will not run again until the second Condition passes. Instead, the second Condition will run on each tick until it passes and gives turn to the first Condition again." yes that is probably not correct.