fxDreema

    • Register
    • Login
    • Search
    • Back to the main page
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Search

    Shrink stop / minimum TP issue

    Bug Reports
    4
    7
    1705
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • R
      robertk last edited by robertk

      Hello, i am running into an issue with the " shrink stops" block.
      At the moment i want to do something with the following settings:

      0_1579011069537_ShrinkStops.jpg

      What i notice however is that each TP pre-set on trades will be overruled by the value in pips put here. If i leave this box empty "0" will be used, if i put 50 the 50 will overwrite any TP's <50.

      Is there a way to not only use " no change" for shrink TP, but also for the minimum TP to not impact current TP's at all? Positions without a TP would not receive a new TP by means of minimum TP for that matter..

      roar 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
      • l'andorrà
        l'andorrà last edited by

        Personally I never use that block. Could you please explain what do you exactly need?

        (English) I will try to help everyone in these fxDreema forums. But if you want to learn how to use the platform in depth or more quickly, I can help you with my introductory fxDreema course in English at https://www.theandorraninvestor.eu.

        (Català) Miraré d’ajudar tothom en aquests fòrums d’fxDreema. Tanmateix, si vols aprendre a fer servir la plataforma amb més profunditat o més de pressa, t’hi puc ajudar amb el meu curs d’introducció a fxDeema en català a https://www.theandorraninvestor.eu/ca.

        (Español) Intentaré ayudar a todo el mundo en estos foros de fxDreema. Sin embargo, si quieres aprender a usar la plataforma en profundidad o más deprisa, te puedo ayudar con mi curso de introducción a fxDreema en español en https://www.theandorraninvestor.eu/es.

        R 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • roar
          roar @robertk last edited by

          @robertk said in Shrink stop / minimum TP issue:

          If i leave this box empty "0" will be used, if i put 50 the 50 will overwrite any TP's <50.

          Isn't using 0 value the solution here? Or do you have negative TPs? Use a big negative number, like -10000?

          Need small help? Tag me in your post
          Need big help? https://www.fiverr.com/big_algo/automate-your-winning-strategy-in-mql4-or-mql5

          R 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • R
            robertk @roar last edited by

            @roar

            While “0” works whenever a TP is set on a trade (it does not change the TP here), it will use a TP of “0” whenever the trade does not have a TP, instant killing the trade. I would rather have the option to disable this part of the block, and let the TP be decided in other parts of the system.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • R
              robertk @l'andorrà last edited by robertk

              @l-andorrà

              Per time interval i wish to shrink my stops by
              certain amount, but i do not wish to have the TP impacted at all.

              T 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • T
                trader.philipps @robertk last edited by

                @robertk If that block doesn't work for you, why don't you use the modify stops block instead?

                I like to share my knowledge, but expect the others to contribute as well.

                R 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • R
                  robertk @trader.philipps last edited by

                  @trader-philipps

                  At first i did not want to use this block because i want to maintain a minimum SL. I just realized however that i could combine the modify stop block with a counter pass "n" times block. Within the modify stops block i use % of current SL, which will be trigged "x" times. Tested and this seems to do the job just fine as an alternative. Thanks for your insight.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                  • 1 / 1
                  • First post
                    Last post

                  Online Users

                  J
                  B
                  A
                  T
                  M
                  E
                  C

                  19
                  Online

                  146.7k
                  Users

                  22.4k
                  Topics

                  122.6k
                  Posts

                  Powered by NodeBB Forums | Contributors