Topics created by ekanters

All pink and purple blocks are a little bit specific, they must be used in their context. Pink blocks are to be used within a loop created by "For each..." blocks, purple blocks are to be used under "on Trade".

In any case, if you want to trail stop, you must work under "on Tick", because the stop must be always monitored. The thing is that "Trailing stop" block should not be placed right after "Sell" or "Buy" blocks, because in such way "Trailing stop" does not run on every tick.

If you want to separate trades or orders, take a look at their "Group #" parameter.

Try the Adjust field. You can write there something like +0.0005 or even +5pips. Better read the description of "Condition"

PROBLEM SOLVED. I need to read better. Must be DOUBLE instead of INT.

True, here is how it looks for me
http://i.imgur.com/LDZaZeq.png

Ok thanks for the help.

I just added an additional condition check before the entry and that is giving me the results I wanted.

So it's pretty much just a quadruple MA cross trading robot 😄

if you have checked the Compare parameter to be input parameter, uncheck it

This block is hidden. I decided to hide it primarily because it gives "independent" signals. I mean...it works for itself and does not care what is going on before and after it. The reason why I created this block was to cover that strategy where you buy-sell-buy-sell, but this can be created with trading blocks as well, and will be more accurate. With "Signals" block, it can give you a signal and then the trading block may fail, and this will corrupt the strategy.
Without Signals block strategy like this looks like:

No buys -> Condition -> Close sells -> Buy now
No sells -> Opposite condition -> Close buys -> Sell now

And you can see that here conditions are checked depending on what trades there are exists right now, and Signals do that no matter what trades exists, if any.

I'm also thinking about hiding "Formula" block 🙂 Or to upgrade it somehow.

Pink blocks are to be used with "For each ...." blocks. Read the description of "For each Pending Order" for details.

PLEASE PROVIDE EASY METHOD FOR STOCHASTIC DIVERGENCE DO SOMETHING ON THE EXISTING DIVERGENCE INDICATOR THAT IT SHOULD GET VALUES FROM THE EXISTING BUFFERS

If needed, "Once per bar" block can be used. It matter if it is located before or after the condition. In one case you have "Once per bar check that condition" and in the other you have "Check that condition (on every tick) and if it is true then once per bar do the next things".

Don't "panic" so much :)) It's normal to forget some EA working on another chart. This happens to me often, even when I use the Tester most of the time. Actually backtesting helps for this to happen, because there is new chart created on every backtest, and eventually you have tons of charts and you don't remember where EAs are and if there are any somewhere 🙂 So... closing all charts should be enough.

I think I get the Idea. Thanks

Maybe I did something or maybe I didn't. Its a testing account so will restart the whole thing and see what happens when I disconnect the internet cable for a moment. When the problem remains I think a vps is the best solution.

When "Once per bar" is placed at top level under "on Tick", it passes once when a new bar is created (at the first tick from the new bar). If it is placed under some condition, then it could pass "anywhere".

http://fxdreema.com/forum/topic/1983 🙂