@fxDreema It is absolutely absurd that we can choose the color for comment Title text (Font color: Title), but not for the Data Row text. Would be great if you could add this option (Font color: Data row).
I strongly believe Drawing text is not a good alternative for this purpose.
Posts made by hamedonline
-
RE: Change "Comment Message" text colorposted in Questions & Answers
-
Area resize disabledposted in Bug Reports
I no longer have the little arrow in right down corner of areas to resize them.
-
RE: Weekly Candle High (by candle ID) Bugposted in Bug Reports
@fxdreema ok, here's the problem. When you add the indicator in forward testing, numbers are right. The problem exists in backtesting as I have attached the samples:
https://prnt.sc/hmxpis
http://prntscr.com/hmxq42and since we need the numbers to fine tune the variables in backtests, ea never works as expected. I even had a division by zero error while backtesting (I tracked that and noticed ea returns zero for highest price by candles period)...
I'd appreciate if you shed some light on this issue. -
RE: Weekly Candle High (by candle ID) Bugposted in Bug Reports
@miro1360 In some cases this could be true, but there's another point though that falsifies this assumption. No other timeframe (except weekly as we see) with the same (Candle High) condition, produces this kind of behavior. This is why I'm skeptical and somehow sure that it is caused by a bug...
By the way, I just updated the shared EA and you can see and confirm it for yourself (no duplicate values for Candle Low!).
I'm pretty sure this is a bug and it also effects calculation of highest price by candles period (only if you choose weekly timeframe in More Settings) .
=> Market Properties -> Highest Price (Candles period) :: More settings -> timeframe: Weekly -
RE: Weekly Candle High (by candle ID) Bugposted in Bug Reports
@miro1360 Please check the shared EA and run it on your metatrader platform.
Why do you think the output values for weekly candles 1, 2 and 3 are the same? -
Weekly Candle High (by candle ID) Bugposted in Bug Reports
Hi there,
I believe there's a bug regarding weekly timeframe candle high by Candle ID (maybe for other values too).
I noticed this bug also effects calculation of Highest Price (Candles Period) for weekly timeframe.The following EA is a simple demonstration of values. As you can see, all comment output values of candle high for different week candle IDs show the previous week's (candle ID = 1) value.
https://fxdreema.com/shared/F6I4KBxUb@fxDreema Please do check this bug immediately since it seems to be a serious and urgent one.
-
RE: Multidimensional Arraysposted in Questions & Answers
@fxdreema eagerly waiting to see it implemented, thanks

-
Multidimensional Arraysposted in Questions & Answers
Hi everyone,
I need to declare and use multidimensional arrays (which are obviously supported by MQL4, up to four dimensions):
https://book.mql4.com/variables/arraysThe problem rises when you declare an array with more than one dimension in fxDreema's Project Variables. It gets trimmed to one dimension after you apply your changes.
var_array[10][2] => var_array[10]I'd appreciate if anyone would share his/her solution to this problem, @fxDreema and @miro1360 help needed

-
RE: I only have problems with the new version !!!posted in Questions & Answers
This is the mistake I also made. Terminal Variables are not the ones you define on your EA.
The right way to use your custom defined variables:
http://prntscr.com/90q9mu
http://prntscr.com/90q98k
[right click on field to select your variable] -
RE: Condition Check and Formula Calculations using Terminal Variablesposted in Questions & Answers
Oh thank you, my bad, I understand now. Changed as you suggested and it works

I know you could be terribly busy, but would be glad if you also answered highlighted 3 to 5 quotes. -
RE: Condition Check and Formula Calculations using Terminal Variablesposted in Questions & Answers
Hi,
I have faced a few problems so far regarding terminal variables and using them to check conditions or calculate formulas.
I'd be glad if you could shed some light on these matters. Apologies first, for the long post ahead
Please note that shared copies are not strategies, just simple conditions or order placement commands for demonstration purposes only.
-
Checking condition using a Boolean terminal variable:
https://fxdreema.com/shared/3NvSOAKEd
I use terminal variables (as inputs) for condition check (and changing lot size), as attached.
http://i58.tinypic.com/2wovl0h.png
There is no difference if another variable of an integer type is used, no orders are placed. Would you please kindly check why no order executes? -
Using terminal variable to calculate lot volume size:
This formula actually uses account balance to generate proper lot size:
loSize = AccountBalance * 0.000025
So, if account balance goes up or down, lots size changes respectfully, by a custom factor.
https://fxdreema.com/shared/tOeTGVRfb
http://i58.tinypic.com/27zgas1.png
http://i58.tinypic.com/23wv1bl.png
Just like the previous example, no order happens. -
Formulas
I tend to see Formula block as the heart of this fabulous EA builder, especially when trades are based on custom complex formulas, this block plays an enormous rule.
Formula block is currently limited to only two operands which makes it so hard to generate complex formulas.
I know, it might be possible and even easier coding the formula by adding custom MQL code, but still somehow it doesn't feel right. I wonder if you have plans to take this block one step further. -
Since I mainly use Desktop version, I noticed there is no MQL prefix field while defining variables in web based version of fxDreema. Am I wrong or is it placed somewhere else?
-
I tried to import Desktop generated MQL to web app (and vice versa) but an error occurred. Are these two apps (web version and Desktop version) incompatible?
I'm sorry this got too long, but I believe some other users may have the same questions as well. I thought it would be better to share them publicly in detail and ask for your guidance.
Many many thanks in advance Radoslav, you are an exceptional outstanding talented guy, with a great product

-