'For each position' doesn't work either. Not a single trade for group 2 is opened. Is there any way to create two separate groups of trades in which the second one must be repeatedly checked and not just once? I begin to believe that it's not possible. 
I tried with an 'if trade' block, but obviously no buys orders were opened.
Any idea?
No problem to me either.
@spuzy said in Beginning with groups:
I fail to understand the problem in the first question. this will open only 1 trade for group 1, but group 2 will open any time both the conditions are true. isn't that what you want?
Yes that's exactly what I want, but unfortunately one single trade belonging to group 2 is opened, no matter how many times all conditions are true. I know I need to 'envelope' all group 2 conditions but that's what I don't know how to do. Which block can I use on top of group 2 buys to identify those trades as belonging to that group? I tried 'Bucket of trades', but it doesn't work at all. Not a single group 2 trade is opened.
Any suggestion?
@angela said in FxDreema is awesome!:
I don't agree at all
The reasons:
On the face value it looks great and very user friendly, but it is not so. There are so many complexities and condusions
I dare ask if anybody has been able to make a complete running EA? Can he share this with us guys ?
The admins/ creator have shown or shared no example of a running EA for the users
why ? I don't understand.The admin is requested to share fully working ea's atleast 10 so that we do not grope in dark
There seems to be no support from a dedicated admin. If you guys are charging from us then there has to be a fully operation demo guide and a staff person to help in the problems. You have left this to user groups to help each other
I partially agree. What the admin doesn't say is that THINKING AND PLANNING as a mql4/mql5 programmer is required. It is true that no language programming is required, but knowing how LOGIC rules do is a must.
I can show you up to 6 of my fully functional EAs that work. Unfortunately the simply destroy any balance you put into your account :).
Read previous answer.
Read answer 2. You need to have a good strategy BEFORE designing any EA.
I completely agree. That is a tragedy. Here is where fxDreema simply fails. Admin's intervention in this forum is simply too meager for the money we pay.
Thank you musabbb. I guessed duplicating groups would work. And what can you tell me about problem 1? Any hint?
I found a second problem. I added a structure for closing trades from both groups:
https://fxdreema.com/shared/ZcAR4T01d
Now when a trade from group 1 achieves its target (50 pips), the group 2 trade is closed simultanoeusly no matter what. What I want is that every trade has that same target, no matter what group they belong to. In summary:
This is a short version of my project (for buys only):
https://fxdreema.com/shared/UGX0egcub
Group 1 trades are opened correctly. As musabbb said the group's number is detailed at the beginning and the end of the left thread.
Problem is on Group 2. Now I know why: there's no 'initial' group namimg on top of the right thread. But I cannot put a 'No position' block there because I want to open as many buy trades as possible by using those conditions on the right. What block should I use there then?
I recently discovered how useful trade groups can be. My problem is I don't fully understand how they work. I see I can define a group on each Buy/Sell block but I also see I need to define that same group on top of the conditions leading to that buy/sell block. I see I can use 'If trade', 'No trade', etc.
My problem is at creating the second group. I can specify it on Buy/sell block again, but what if I cannot use 'No trade' block on top because I want many trades on that 2nd group? I cannot use 'If trade' either because there would not be a first trade for the second group. How can I define then the origin of conditions of that 2nd group?
@miro1360 said in Is this forum read by the administrator?:
I don't think this is what you (or other members) want to see here
Why not if offered as an extra price? I would be more than happy to pay an extra price for a service like that. Maybe a complementary monthly fee separated from the present ones. Has the administrator considered it?
@miro1360 said in Is this forum read by the administrator?:
@isp00rt said in Is this forum read by the administrator?:
That's not the solution. This is a commercial site. If I pay for a service, I want that service! I don't expect all other clients helping me!
You paid for the tool as is, there is no paid helping service
Admin is working on rough bugs immediately, but something is not possible. Most random errors are produced by MT5, especially after updates from the side of MT5. I think your issue will not be solved, because other people are using the blocks as they are (the counting pips problem). You can try to find an workaround, or use what works (MT4). I think, you found some help in your 400 posts, people did their best what was possible in their free time, for free.
This is what is said on the 'Support' page of fxDreema:
It's better if you put your question in the forum, but if you prefer intimacy, use the contact form below or send an e-mail to support@fxdreema.com.
It is true that solving problems on the forums is 'The tool as is', but as you can read personal support is also offered. This is why that email address is called 'support', I guess. 
I know I can MT4 instead fo MT5 and trying workarounds, but then why is MT5 offered? Why not limiting fxDreema to MT4 only?
I will never be grateful enough with all people who have helped me in this forums for years, including you miro, probably the foremost contributor to my knowledge of this platform. Let me publicly acknowledge you impressive work on tutorials and free help to everyone here.
But that is not the problem. I think this is the moment to tell the administrator that he needs take a leap forward to improve the way technical support is offered so far. He's crearly overwhelmend by the management of this site. This is clearly an impressively achieved one-man company. IMHO what is required now is a few additional hands dedicated to deal with this huge daily background on the forums while he focus his precious time on improving the platform from a technical point of view.
Firstly let me clarify that when I say the administrator is not reading the forum, I mean the Bugs forum only, not all the other.
Secondly let me express my frustration for my expectations about MT5 on fxDreema being shattered. I will have to accept that this tool will never be as developed for MT5 as for MT4.
Thirdly, I want to express my gratitude towards Spuzy and Hadees for their interest in my problem. Let me show you what is torturing me:
a) This problem with MT4 to MT5 conversion:
https://fxdreema.com/forum/topic/6996/same-blocks-different-results-for-mt5
No response so far.
b) This problem with custom indicators on MT5:
https://fxdreema.com/forum/topic/6982/my-first-manually-customized-indicator-doesn-t-work
In this case the admin was perfectly kind and informative, no complain on that side. Unfortunately, no explanation can be found anywhere as to why that happens.
Sorry for my bitterness, but I feel there should be a more efficient way to solve technical problems like those apparenty are.
That's not the solution. This is a commercial site. If I pay for a service, I want that service! I don't expect all other clients helping me!
The last message from the administrator in this forum was almost TWO months ago. Is this a subtel way to tell us no to write here anymore? I'm really worried about not seeing any fixing activity on this platform! This is specially true when considering its performace on MT5, far from good when compared to MT4.
Is this the beginning of the end of fxDreema?
This is a serious problem on fxDreema right now. I am waiting for a solution to that same problem for more than one month ago, but to no avail so far... The administratos is completely ignoring all problems gathering on Bugs forum.
@ambrogio Thank you for your interest.
New try with a new indicator. Exactly the same result.
0_1556532240817_ZigzagColor.mq5
https://fxdreema.com/shared/a7VlZJYne
Could you please confirm you get the same result too?
A long vacation for 27 days (look at my first message's date)?