Now instead Constants, Input checkboxes are used. No difference at that point 🙂
I think this is better: http://fxdreema.com/shared/zrV0t7UBd
The only points where SL can be modified are BE and TS. If you got "Error: Invalid SL requested" again, put it here. I have made a little update where it will print Ask/Bid price instead open price.

These MM options (% of...) are maybe not useful in every situation. If it is "% of Balance" and the value is 100(%) and Balance is 10000 and the market is EURUSD when 1 lot is 100000, then the lot size will be 0.1.

I think this indicator is loaded, but can't be read or something like that. Is it working otherwise, if you use it manually? Or within another EA somewhere from internet? And after these error messages, will it eventually start to work or they have no end?
How about input parameters, are they ok? - the same parameters count and order, the same datatypes or at least compatible datatypes?

Things are not "now and then", they are always "now". And you can expect that as I can see, because you are using "Once per tick" block, which is actually not needed.
So, when you have conditions like this - one after another - if the first one is not true, the next one will not be checked at all. Let's take "5 MA x> 50 MA" for example - this condition can be true (the block can pass) multiple times in one specific candle, but not all the time after that condition. "5 MA > 200 MA" can, it is always true and the block always passes (if executed) when MA5 is above MA200.

Play with this to see different crossover situations and what is going on: http://fxdreema.com/shared/tpuyHHxdb

Can you show me more details? Maybe the name of the block, or part from the MQL4 code that contains this error + some more rows from above and below?

can you look at these blocks
they seem to be back to front

OK ...the Indicator problem is gone ...
I uninstal and reinstal Crome in my main PC.
Now FXDreema works perfectly .. i think so 🙂

fxDreema I'm sorry, but I understood what he meant. I need not put SL in the opening price.

I reuploaded 069 with these 2 fixes.

Hey! Cursor back again! Must have been in the re-uploaded local v067. Thanks again.
🙂

Yes, sticky problem fixed! Thank you!
🙂

__Work with Candle ID > 0. Click on this "More settings" text to see this option. It looks that for the current candle there is no information that can be used, but for already finished candles there is. I think more custom indicators should be like this :)[/quote:1cykrli6]

Thank you.
You have right. The indicator looks one candle backward. I must watchs one figure on this in future.

Quite so , but you are a pioneer in high-level programming. The correct robots in future will require millions of algorithms
(Like Star Trek Data). My final forex bot use a little more than a hundred blocks. maybe this one is too ambitious project, but very interesting.
Perhaps the best platform for this kind should be NET Framework, but it is a different story, it.
I hope you find a compromise between the new and the old code, pointless greed for too much.
Now there are enough opportunities to create your own forex bot.
And now i open new beer ... cheers ... and Happy New Year for all ... 😄

I noticed. I will fix it, but I think the example was something simple, not very important 🙂

If you have TeamViewer, send me your data on PM or email.

That looks bad. I don't know exactly why it happened, so I can recommend to relod the generator (or the project), to move one step back (before that paste) and to try on clear 🙂

That position is opened long time ago, why it's open price to change? I mean, someone else will prefer open price to remain the same... and it seems that this is the case. Try to modify relative to the current market price (the first option in Modify block) - it will choose Ask or Bid depending on the position type.

I need more details.
In any case, I was not updated MQL4/MQL5 code from weeks maybe, because now I'm working locally for some update. And I just tested this one, it seems to work: http://fxdreema.com/shared/WBF288Gvc

thank you , Working fine now

This block is hidden. I decided to hide it primarily because it gives "independent" signals. I mean...it works for itself and does not care what is going on before and after it. The reason why I created this block was to cover that strategy where you buy-sell-buy-sell, but this can be created with trading blocks as well, and will be more accurate. With "Signals" block, it can give you a signal and then the trading block may fail, and this will corrupt the strategy.
Without Signals block strategy like this looks like:

No buys -> Condition -> Close sells -> Buy now
No sells -> Opposite condition -> Close buys -> Sell now

And you can see that here conditions are checked depending on what trades there are exists right now, and Signals do that no matter what trades exists, if any.

I'm also thinking about hiding "Formula" block 🙂 Or to upgrade it somehow.

nice 🙂