PARTIAL CLOSE

[l'andorrà]

@kestra I'm afraid I cannot provide any help for custom code, sorry. I'm not a programmer

[kestra]

@l-andorrà OK SIR!.

[kestra]

@l-andorrà I HAVE GOTTEN A SOLUTION TO THAT SIR, THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
SIR PLS WHICH OF THE REFERENCE PRICE SHOULD I USE, I WANT FOR EXAMPLE THE PIP AWAY FROM OPEN PRICE SHOULD BE, FOR BUY TRADES, 20 PIPS FROM THE OPEN PRICE AND THE BID AND FOR SELL TRADES, 20 PIPS FROM THE OPEN PRICE AND THE ASK. WHICH OF THESE IS CORRECT, ''ASK FOR BUY, BID FOR SELL'' OR ''BID FOR BUY, ASK FOR SELL''.

[l'andorrà]

@kestra If I underatsnd correctly what you want, it should be the second option.

[kestra]

@l-andorrà THANK YOU VERY MUCH!. YEA WHAT I WANT IS THAT I WANT THE PIPS AWAY FROM THE OPEN PRICE TO BE MEASURED FROM BID IF ITS BUY AND TO BE MEASURED FROM ASK IF ITS A SELL TRADE!.

[l'andorrà]

@kestra You're welcome.

[kestra]

@l-andorrà SIR SINCE SPILLAGE IS EITHER POSITIVE OR NEGATIVE, HOW CAN ONE AVOID THE NEGATIVE SPILLAGE ? WOULD ENTERING A VALUE IN THE SPILLAGE AVOID THAT ?

[jstap]

@kestra If you put 0 in slippage it will ensure no slippage, but this will act for positive and negative.

[l'andorrà]

@jstap Exactly.

[kestra]

@jstap THANK YOU SIR

[kestra]

@l-andorrà THANK YOU SIR

[kestra]

@jstap IS THERE A WAY TO AVOID IT ALL.

[jstap]

@kestra Slippage? If so put a 0 in the box.

[kestra]

@jstap YEA, OK SIR

[kestra]

@l-andorrà SIR PLS CAN YOU HELP ME WITH THIS CONDITIONS, LET'S SAY FOR EURUSD I HAD A LOSS OF A LOT SIZE 3.0, I WANT THE EA TO PICK A TRADE OF DOUBLE THE LOT SIZE ON ANY OTHER MARKET THAT WOULD CLOSE WITH 0.02 LOT OR LESS .

[l'andorrà]

@kestra Not sure I fully understand. Do you want to cover a 3.0 lost size position with another 0.02 lot size? That would require a huge TP distance unles the lost one was ver shortlived. Can you please be more detailed?

[kestra]

@l-andorrà I MEAN MARTINGALE, BUT YOU KNOW MARTINGALE IS LET SAY SAME TRADE E.G EURUSD, THOUGH I ALREADY HAVE THAT. BUT I WANT TO MINIMIZE THE RISK BY SPREADING THE RISK OR BY BASICALLY SHARING THE RISK OF A SINGLE MARKET WITH ANOTHER MARKET, SINCE THE MAJOR RISK OR MARTINGALE IS CONSECUTIVE LOSSES. SO THE NORMAL MARTINGALE FOR THE SINGLE MARKET STARTS FROM 0.01 LOT BUT WHEN THE LOT SIZE AS INCREASED TO LIKE 4.0 LOT. I WANT THE EA TO LOOK FOR ANOTHER CURRENCY THAT HAS, 0.01 TRADE ON 0R LET SAY O.O4 MAX, ANY TIME THAT OCCURS, SO THAT WHEN THE LATER TRADE FROM THE 0.04 OR LESS TRADE OF THE OTHER MARKET CLOSES EITHER PROFIT OR NEGATIVE, THE NEXT LOT WOULD BE DOUBLE OF THE TRADE FROM THE EURUSD. SO INSTEAD OF THE EURUSD TRADE TO CONTINUE WITH ITS OWN MARTINGALE IT WILL PLACE A NEW TRADE OF SAME CLOSED LOT, BUT IT WILL OPEN ITS OWN DOUBLE I.E 8.0 LOT ON THE OTHER MARKET. I HOPE YOU UNDERSTAND SIR.

[kestra]

@l-andorrà ?

[l'andorrà]

@kestra Not sure I fully understand. Basically, if the EA lost several consecutive trades on one chart a new chart should be selected to begin the sequance again? If so, why not beginning the new sequence again on the same chart?

[kestra]

@l-andorrà YES EXACTLY SIR!. BUT I THOUGHT OVER IT A GAIN AND I DISCOVERED IT WOULD CREATE A VERY COMPLEX NETWORKS INTO THE FUTURE IN THE SENSE THAT THERE WOULD BE LOTS OF TRADES QUEUED IN THE MIND OF THE EA, BUT WHAT AM NOT SURE IS HE WOULD THE EA PICK EACH AND EXECUTE IT ? AND THE OTHER IS THAT AS IT GOES INTO HE FUTURE I WOULD NOT BE ABLE TO TRACE WHICH TRADE RESULT INTO WHICH. BUT IF I HAVE THE GUARANTEE THAT THE EA WOULD PICK EACH TRADE QUEUED IN ITS MIND, MAYBE WE WOULD CONSIDER THE STRATEGY IN THE FUTURE. BUT I INTENDED WAS TO SPLIT HE TRADE OVER 5 OTHER CHARTS THAT WOULD SATISFY THE ENTRY CONDITION. SO THAT INSTEAD OF HAVING LETS SAY LOT SIZE 10.00 IT WOULD NOW BE 2.0 ON 5 OTHER CHARTS WHILE THE INITIALLY CHART WOULD NOW RESTART.