Pending order in sequence (one after the others)

[Adeusi2011]

×
l'andorrà
A Adeusi2011
please and please am yet to solve the problems, 1. IF I PLACE TWO PENDING ORDER. ONE BUY STOP (LOT 0.1) AND ONE SELL STOP (LOT 0.1). IF ONE TRIGGERED, THE SECOND ONE WHICH MAY BE EITHER SELL STOP OR BUY STOP MUST BE MODIFY TO (LOT 0.2) OR ADD ANOTHER OPEN PENDING ORDER TRADE OF (LOT 0.1) TO MAKE (LOT 0.2). SO IF THE FIRST TRADE REACH PROFIT THEN DELETE ALL PENDING ORDERS. AND START ALL OVER AGAIN. OR IF PROFIT NO REACH AND THE NEW PENDING ORDER (0.2) TRIGGERED, THEN PLACE NEW PENDING ORDER(0.3) IN THE OPPOSITE OF NEWEST OPENED TRADE, IF THE PROFIT REACH, THEN DELETE ALL PENDING ORDERS AND START ALL OVER AGAIN. OR ELSE PLACE NEW PENDING ORDER(0.4) IN THE OPPOSITE OF THE NEWEST TRIGGERED TRADE. Note: all buy stop must be on the same line and all sell stop must be on the same line too. But it will trigger one after the other as explained in the page. Thanks so much

[l'andorrà]

@adeusi2011 You are looking for a martingale. I do not recommend you to focus on that kind of strategy. They are not successful in the long run.

[Adeusi2011]

@l-andorrà Thanks, so what strategy can be successful, please let me see. Thanks

[l'andorrà]

@adeusi2011 That the holy grial of trading, my friend! If I had found a profitable successful strategy in the long term, I would not be here. My recommendation in this case is to try to find your own way of trading. Find your timeframe is extremely important, for example. Are you an interday or an intrady trader? Scalping or swing trading? As soon as you find your comfort zone in trading you can then consider the possibility of creating an EA, IMHO.

[Adeusi2011]

@l-andorrà Please can you help me on my first request that you said is not really good, i mean my first request

[l'andorrà]

@adeusi2011 I sent you a PM.