PLEASE ADD THIS
-
@l-andorrà I HAVE MOVED AND REMOVED THEM SIR. https://fxdreema.com/shared/yCxD7NOqe
-
@l-andorrà HAVE DONE IT SIR!!
-
@kestra Now I don't understadn why are you repeting the same block trees with the exact same blocks one time and another. Why not using one only blocks tree? I see that trees 25 a 53 are all of them clones!
-
@l-andorrà ITS PART OF THE STRATEGY, TO TAKE OUT PROFITS AS THE PRICE MOVES IN OUR FAVOUR , I INCREASED IT TO CREATE EFFICIENCY, IN THAT NOT TO LOSE MORE LOT SIZE. THOUGH IF IT LOOSE IT MULTIPLIES ON THE NEX TRADE AND PRODUCE MORE PROFIT BUT ITS BETTER NOT TO RISK MORE.
-
@kestra But I see no difference at all in those blocks. They are doing exactly the same! Are you sure they are set correctly?
-
@l-andorrà YES, THEY ARE CORRECT, EACH TAKES OUT PROFIT AT SPECIFIC DISTANCE BASED ON THE LOT SIZE AND RELATIVE TO CANDLE 1 BODYSIZE. THEY ARE DOING THE SAME THING AS PARTIAL CLOSE. THOSE THAT ARE SIMILAR ONLY ENSURES THAT LARGER LOT SIZES ARE REDUCED DRASTICALLY AT A LEVEL WE THINK IT WOULD HAVE MADE THE PROFIT AND TO REDUCE ITS RISK IF IT GOES AGAINST US AFTER REACHING THE LEVEL. FOR EXAMPLE, LOT SIZE 0.05 COULD BE REDUCED TO 0.02 PARTICULAR DISTANCE AND O.O2 WILL BE REDUCE AT A DISTANCE TOO. THIS IS BASED ON THE PAST LOSSES AND THE LOT SIZE SEQUENCE, TO KNOW HOW TO RECOVER WITH THE CURRENT LOT AND TO MAKE SOME PROFIT AND NOT TO RISK MORE AS LONG AS THE DIRECTIONS IS FAVOURABLE.
-
@kestra Ok. Now I see. The problem is that you are requiring to close a 70% partially on every distance. That cannot happen because lot size will not necessarily be a number that can be closed at thart specific % on each level. Closing the 70% after a previous 70% will more than probably make the platform to ignore that order. You should select a more realistc % distribution.
-
@l-andorrà IT WORKS IT APPROXIMATES AND ROUNDUP THE RESULTING LOT SIZE TO TWO DECIMAL PLACE , FOR EXAMPLE 70% OF 0.02 WILL BE 0.014 BUT 0.01 WILL BE CLOSED AND AND IF THE SITUATION IS 0.025 IT BECOMES 0.03 IT NEVER REJECTS IT I HAVE BEING TESTING IT AND SOMETIMES IT CLOSES TWO OR MORE TIMES TO MEET UP WITH THE %. I CAN USE 50% IT DOES NOT MATTER AS LONG AS THE INITIAL LOT SIZE IS EMPTIED AT A PROFITABLE DISTANCE LEAVING 0.01 LOT REMAINING TO FOLLOW THE TREND. 70% REDUCES THE BIGGER LOTS FAST.
-
@kestra Ok. In that case you can do two thing. Firstly you don't need to use so many 'check trades count' blocks. They are doing the same. Just use one only on top all oll those block trees. Secondly, you should add a new condition block below each condition block right now. So for example, on block 34 you have that lot size is supposed to be >=0.03. Then you should connect another condition block below so that lot size should be <0.05. That is what is required by block 27. Then you need to repeat the process with all the other block trees. Each one is supposed to be searching for a very narrow lot size segment.
-
@l-andorrà OK SIR, IF I GET YOUR FIRST EXPLANATION FOR THE CHECK TRADE COUNT BLOCK SO IT'S GOING TO RESULT TO SOMETHING LIKE A TRIANGULAR TREE ON THE REST, LIKE THIS IMAGE. BUT THE LOT SIZE EXPLANATION IS NOT CLEAR, ALL THE LOT SIZE CONDITIONS CHECKS LOT SIZE >= . SO THAT EVEN IF A TRADE, FOR EXAMPLE 0.10 LOT WAS REDUCED BY THE >=0.05 LOT PARTIAL CLOSE, AS IT MOVES IN OUR DIRECTION IT CAN ALSO BE REDUCED BY >= 0.03 LOT PARTIAL CLOSE IF IT HAS >= 0.03 LOT LEFT. BUT THE EXAMPLE YOU GIVE IS < 0.05 SO HAVING THAT WILL RESTRICT 0.05 LOT OR ANY BIGGER LOT TO BE REDUCED AT THAT LEVEL .
-
@kestra The problem with your current distribution of lot size closing is easy to understand. Let's imagine your trade is 0.1 lots. This means that as soon as it is open the following conditions will apply AT THE SAME TIME:
- Is lot size >= 0.03? Yes, so the lot size is partially closed.
- Is lot size >= 0.05? Yes, so the lot size is partially closed again.
- Is lot size >= 0.07? Yes, so the lot size is partially closed again.
And so on
You do not want that. You want your trade to be close just ONCE if it is >= 0.1. This means the new lot size will be 0.5, for example. Then you want to a new condition to apply for that lot size to be partially closed again later, not at the exact same tick where the previous partial close happened.
-
@l-andorrà YES SIR, THEY ARE ALL ACTIVE BUT AT DIFFERENT ''PIPS AWAY FROM THE OPEN'', THOUGH THE PIPS A WAY IS CLOSE JUST TO MAKE SURE THE 0.1 LOT IS REDUCED AROUND THAT LEVEL. SO THE PIPS AWAY MAKES ONE TO BE ACTIVE AT A TIME. IS THAT NOT SO SIR ?
-
@kestra And that is exacrtly the problem. Although pips distance is different the partial close % is applicable to ALL previous percentages. Let em explain. If you say that 50% is to be closed at a distance, then when price hits that distance the 50% will be applied, but ALSO ALL the previous pecentages. This is why you need to specify each lot size segment as I suggested 4 posts above. You need two condition blocks per each pips distance to determine the segmentes loty size. For example, >=0.3 and <0.5.
-
@l-andorrà OKAY!!!, WAOO, I THINK I GET IT WHAT YOU ARE SAYING SIR. I HAVE NOT THOUGHT OF THAT BUT SURPRISINGLY I THINK ''ONCE PER BAR'' AND ''CHECK TRADE COUNT'' IS HANDLING FEW OF THE ANOMALIES THAT CAN OCCUR IN THAT WINDOW, COS IF LET'S SAY 0.5 WAS REDUCED TO 0.3 AT 9.5 PIP 0.03 WILL AUTOMATICALLY BE ACTIVE ON IT SINCE IT AS PASSED O.9 PIP. BUT BASICALLY A PARTIAL CLOSE WILL BE ACTIVE ONCE ON A BAR, BUT IF THE MARKET IS ON A NEW BAR FAR BEYOND THE PIPS AWAY IT BECOMES ACTIVE AGAIN. ALTHOUGH I DID THE CALCULATIONS SOMETHINGS AGO WHICH I WANT IT TO EMPTY BAGS OF LOT AT A LEVEL, AND BY THE MAT IT WOULD HAVE REDUCED THE PAST LOSS AND PROBABLY MAKE PROFIT AT THAT LEVEL OR THE NEXT LEVEL SO IN THIS WAY YOUR POST BEFORE THE LAST WILL BE TRUE. THOUGH SOMETIMES SOME PIPS WOULD HAVE PAST A POINT AND I WOULD BE EXPECTING IT CLOSES AND IT WONT. BUT THIS WOULD REQUIRE THAT I HAVE TO THINK THOUGH THE THE RANGE OF THE SECOND LOT SIZE YOU SUGGESTED SIR AND THAT COULD BE ANOTHER CHALLENGE, THOUGH THE CURRENT STATE IS STILL MANAGEABLE . THANK YOU VERY MUCH SIR.
-
@kestra You're welcome.
-
@l-andorrà THANK YOU VERY MUCH I AM VERY GRATEFUL SIR! BUT ITS LEFT WITH THIS TWO INSTRUCTIONS PLS HELP ME BUILD IT!.
- PLS SIR HELP ME JOIN THESE TO THIS EA, https://fxdreema.com/shared/yCxD7NOqe
I WANT THE EA TO RESIST TO ITS INITIAL LOT SIZE, WHEN THE LOT SIZE OF THE LAST CLOSED TRADE IS GREATER THAN OR EQUAL TO 500 LOT AND THE EQUITY IS LESS THAN OR EQUAL TO $100,000.
- ALSO, I WANT THE EA TO RESIST TO ITS INITIAL LOT SIZE, WHEN THE LOT SIZE OF THE LAST CLOSED TRADE IS GREATER THAN OR EQUAL TO 500 LOT.
THANK YOU SIR!.
-
@kestra I'm afraid I'm not completely sure what you mean by 'resist to its initial lot size'. Do you mean 'reinitiate' maybe?
-
@l-andorrà WHAT I MEAN IS THAT ON THE OCCURRENCE OF THE NEXT SIGNAL IT SHOULD START OVER FROM 0.02 LOT SIZE BEING THE INITIAL LOT. SO LOT 500 SHOULD BE THE MAXIMUM LOT.
-
@kestra Then you need to use a completely different structure based on variables. The value of the variable should be the new lot size on each new trade. That is a more complex structure to do. You can take a look at my martingale structure to find some inspiration:
-
@l-andorrà @jstap
Pls how can i build this, if the lot size is 5.0 if 7 pips away partial close 50% , this close should be allowed only two times in a day the third time and the rest should not be allowed
