Was hard but I find it!!! 
.. is not a problem of the code, it was a problem of the historic data of MT4 ...only is same lapse of time, it failed the reading of CCI data ...In the graphic it worked fine ... needed to display the value to understand.
Sorry! thanks!
Yes, I normally use too the Out of the last block ...
Something strange occur ... I'm doing test and when I find exactly the problem I'll reply to you.
Thanks 
Hello!
It was been difficult to discover this strange bug ..but i have find it:
http://i.imgur.com/WwlbaWq.png
Normally I use the SIDE TABLE to change variables.
In this case i have detect that the BLOCK 7 did not change variables. 
When I have connected the TRACE ACTIVITY it start to work fine .. then I have detach the TRACE ACTIVITY and it follow to work fine! 
It seems start work by the OUT connected!
MY QUESTION:
Work fine the SIDE TABLE to change variables when the Block is the last? (without the output connected)
%(#FF0000)[I have detected (sometimes) that some block have problem when is paste (copying form other block).. is possible?]
Can you check if is something relating with COPY and PAST blocks? ... Try to copy and paste a block and use the variables side ...
Many thanks!
Kind regards!
Yes, I'm agree, this is correct ... do not worry ...I'll find a solution!
Many thanks!
Hello,
really many thanks for the add in the block ...I'll test it and if I see some problem I' ll contact you.
About the "trailing stop block" I understand that it can work for many trades, moreover it can work for each trade bat it has the setting of group, block etc .. is possible to use this functions to separate the trades.
Following the logical of the FxDreema blocks I thing it will be useful to know when the block work or no (just I need it!).
In this case the function of the block is to trail the stop, so I think it would be useful to have the possibility to detect when the block work or no. Then, depending of the strategy, is possible to set for which trade.
For example the block "pips away from stop" has the second output (and is useful...), so I can detect when it work or no.
Thanks...
Hi,
the "trailing stop" block is very good but I cannot use it because it has only ONE OUTPUT and is ALWAYS ON ...so is impossible to detect the time it does not trail!
** I have test with "trace activity" the output of "trailing stop" and is always active even when it doesn't trail the stop.
*Maybe could you add the second output below? 
... it would be very useful do do something when the block not trail!
ORANGE ON: BLOCK TRAILING
YELLOW ON: BLOCK NO TRAILING*
**In this case it would be easy .. when it does not trail is possible to do something! **
http://imageshack.com/i/pmmZO9W7p
Otherwise I must use the block "pips away from stop loss" + "modify stop"
%(#FF0000)[Please but I have not understand yet ... about the "pips away from the stop" ..first reference is "stop loss" and the second is ask or bid?]
http://imageshack.com/i/plVvkNcbp
I have try to use Spread() in various modes and blocks but always get error.
This is not a problem ...only need to create a variable spread!
Thanks.
Yes... this is clear....and very useful!
My question is a little bit complex ...sure I have not explain well.
Anyway I can solve this with "modify stop" and "pips away from stop" blocks. Only I need an option that have all other block ... the possibility to choose if the distance is from bid or ask!
Could you add?... is possible?
Many thanks!
Hi! ... please need suggest ... I do not find the best way to add in every tick the "spread" to trailing stop.
The trailing stop follow the bit price (for sell) or ask price(for buy) but increase/decrease if the spread increase/decrease.
SELL: TRAILING STOP PRICE = bit price + trailing pips + spread
BUY: TRAILING STOP PRICE = ask price - trailing pips - spread
EXAMPLE SELL TRADE:
The Spread is the variable:
Trailing pips= 10 pips
Hip1: Spread= 1 > Trailing stop= 11
Hip2: Spread= 8 > Trailing stop= 18
The best way maybe would be a box adjust in the "trailing stop" block ... so is possible to add a variable value (spread in this case) to the trailing stop value.
Unfortunately this block do not permit the retreat of the stop!
I think the best way is use "modify stop":
I have try with "modify stop" block but it do not trail.
I have try with "extend stop" block but I was unable to do it.
Please can you suggest a block combination to do it please?
Many thanks!
Please I would like to know where the EA take time using "GMT"!
Thanks.
Yes, is true! Excel start with default cell in format "number" so is normal to have problem with commas and maybe other.
I have find this that work fine!
http://imageshack.com/i/pnCGdb8up
Thanks!
Hello,
I'm doing an investigation about the spread in specific moment (signals).
I'm using "write to file" block ... very useful block!
But something wrong occur.
I use various block writing in the same file (I use same name file).
These are 2 signal, one for BUY (COLUMN 1) and one for SELL (COLUMN 2):
http://imageshack.com/i/pnJnoeRMp
The write values are good but there is a problem with the "title column"... it write only the first (and only one) and no more. All the other titles are empty!
Look..in this case the fist signal were sell ... in case of buy it write only the first column!
The bug is that the first block write the values but not the title! I have try to add the same title in all block but do not write it... is strange...why?
http://imageshack.com/i/po7tjk4Op
Please if you can fix it! .. of course I do not test only two (with only two is not a problem!) ... but I need to test more that 40 different signals and spread values to statistics .. and would be useful to have titles!
Thanks!
Hello!
I have a problem with a buffer, I have read all post and your "updated history" about it but I have not found solutions!
I have try a solution but something wrong occur with the "compare block".
I use a custom indicator that have two available buffers.
There are two condition:
1. trend up
http://imageshack.com/i/poOT7urvp
2. trend down
http://imageshack.com/i/pnTfuHzAp
I' need to detect when the buffer = 2147483647 but I cannot do it.
I have try with compare with:
... nothing active the block output
So I have try to compare the two buffers:
http://imageshack.com/i/po6TXRl9p
The problem is that the OUT 1 IS ON when are the same , otherwise OUT 2 DO NOT WORK ...is possible?
http://imageshack.com/i/pmijKs7Sp
%(#FF0000)[I know that this is a value like "null/nothing" but ...Please have you suggest about how to detect this values of the buffer (2147483647)??]
Many thanks!
Hi FXDREEMA community,
I'm working by FXDreema in a project that use "multi time frame" and the indicator Heiken Ashi to detect the multiple regimen of the market. Detect the changed of markets is this in the most important in a EA because permit to change strategy depending of the moment.
I 'am studying the Heiken Ashi and using a several variables and same news my formulas I have created various outputs.
FRACTAL 3.0 is the first release an it seems detect enough correctly the various moments of market.
This is a video of 24 hr of backtest: http://screencast.com/t/BBSZafSTw34
The second step is to improve the market detector
The third step is the trades management
The four is the money management
The final is the test (back-test, demo, real)
Is not easy ...for this reason I'm searching collaborator to work together in the same FXDreema project ... I think that if more people can share experience, knowledge and ideas in the same project is more possible to reach hight targets!
**Please contact me directly only if you have the following requirements:
We'll work in private environment
I speak perfect Italian, Spanish ...and sufficient English languages!
Many thanks!
__Try with "BUY" instead of BUY
I guess there are issues when many variables are used and I will eventually do something about this, but I will recommend to try to not use so many variables. Yes, sometimes they are good way to do something easier, but the idea of the EA builder is not to become second MetaEditor. Even when you code in any programming language, it's not a good idea to have many global variables.
Otherwise in the Variables list, when you hover with the mouse over one of them, the blocks where this Variable is used is glowing like this - http://prntscr.com/afgbpy
By the way, in this particular project I like how you initially put the values from each indicator in a Variable, so then you don't need to select the same indicator over and over again in the blocks.[/quote:3liwyov6]
Hi,
I had try to set the text in this format "text" without error and it work but really there is a problem!
The side block variables accept the text and it work but if you open the block again %(#FF0000)[the cell of the set is empty! (it lost the value ...not fix the input value in the cell)]
The variable work (sure is present in the code) but if you save again the block with the empty cell it erase the value.
Finally ... is impossible to see the set values in the cell and is a problem whet change another setting of the block because when you save, it bored the "text" because it save with empty value!
Please I hope you fix it!
Thanks
Hi...ok, many thanks for the info!
...yes... of course "text" ... I had not try it! It work now! 
Yes, I have seen the glowing of the block but this not work when a block change variable from the side! ...so, if something do not work fine is difficult to detect from where the variable change... is necessary to search block by block (I needed to do it more times). It would be sufficient to detect all blocks with set in the variable side. Otherwise is not a bug ... so if is easy to solve, well, else do not worry!
Yes, is true for too much variables but I need it because I'm working with 4 timeframe, indicator and "formulas" to define condition. Without variables is too much complicated!!
I have see that if the blocks are ordered in a correct sequence (first the system fix variables and then use it to compare, formulas etc..) ...until now I had not problem ... I hope because I have still add more variables!!
If I detect bug I'll contact you ... maybe this can help you to solve the problems!
Thanks. Regards!
Hi,
I think that the setting of variable in the side of blocks is a very useful implement.
However I would like to request something:
**1. Is impossible to identify the blocks that change variable in the side? **
Is very difficult to find the blocks where is the variable side set.
It would be possible to mark (a little point, color, shadow ...) the block that use the side variable set?
2. The side variable set block do not accept "string"
If I set a "text" in the side of the block for a variable "string" type I will get error! Is possible to fix it?
http://i.imgur.com/sRMyVql.png
http://i.imgur.com/a2cTxHQ.png
%(#FF0000)[** ANOTHER LITTLE REQUEST ... ]
Could you add the tool to change the "vertical size of the comment/variable window"? When there are several variables it will be more easy with a more large window... unfortunately is a fix size yet.
Many thanks for your support!
This is fantastic!! 
.. I tried this way buy I had mistake something! All is perfect now, many thanks!
If someone want more info about ENUM_TIMEFRAMES constant type this is a good link:
https://docs.mql4.com/constants/chartco ... timeframes
Please could you give me a confirmation about the "first problem" too (see my post) ?
I have find this solution, all work fine now without warning but I'm not sure if is the best way!!
I have set bool type for constant input but I have used int number (0,1) to compare in block:
TRUE IS = 1
FALSE IS = 0
http://i.imgur.com/BnkwKVH.png
Many thanks!