You almost understood. Come on. See the figure below:
The red line was a false break because it did not close above the line.
The blue line was a real break because it closed above the red line, and rose to the previous maximum.
I need the line to just go up when there's a real break.
Explaining it easier, I guess.
Move up only if the previous candle close above the Highest price. Move down normally.
Vice versa for Lowest Price.
Hello fxDreema! All right? I'm late but I'm responding now.
Almost that. The rule is:
Only when the candle closes above the Highest Price, the line moves. Otherwise the line stays where it is. When the price is falling it works normally.
Vice versa for the Lowest Price.
It's ok. The Donchian channel does not change level while the candle does not close above the line. I need the horizontal line to work just like in the video.
Hello @fxDreema . All right? How long has a doubt been here?
I need the following solution:
Using the Highest Price (Candles period): Draw a horizontal line. If there is a break in the line up with previous candle closing above the Highest Price channel, move the horizontal line, otherwise do nothing. Low tendency to move normally.
Vice versa for Lowest Price.
With this it is possible to filter false or high signals in the price channel.
draw line does not work.
Hello! Draw line seems not to be working.
See my project.
shared/YdommBF4c
@timmyhanke
Here's the link. By default, fxDreema only shares: share/xxxx for example.
https://fxdreema.com/shared/UIgIsffJ
@timmyhanke I do not know what else to do. See the project here. If you know how the same results work on your real account backtest, share with us.
shared/UIgIsffJ
@fxdreema Hello fxDreema. If you remember, I also created an EA that made millions in backtest, but in reality the results are different.
If it were possible to somehow simulate the ticks how it works in the real market, I imagine we would have EAs millionaires among us!
@tcanuto said in Time Bomb Job:
@tcanuto said in Time Bomb Job:
@tcanuto said in Time Bomb Job:
Ah ... these blocks ... if it were possible to operate exactly in real account what is possible in the backtest, we would have excellent setups with only these blocks. It is a way out of the charts and operate directly with ticks, which is how the market works.
I once built a strategy with these blocks, but it turns out that in the backtest on ticks, it's not the same as real ticks on the market. If it were possible to repeat similarly or identically what you do in the backtest on a real account, we will have an EA millionaire.
The secret I believe to be for this to happen is to know how the backtest simulates the historical ticks and do this calculation simulta- neously, but on the actual account.
In short ... make it work exactly what happens in backtestes, but in real account.
I believe the answer is here: https://www.mql5.com/en/articles/75
@tcanuto said in Time Bomb Job:
@tcanuto said in Time Bomb Job:
Ah ... these blocks ... if it were possible to operate exactly in real account what is possible in the backtest, we would have excellent setups with only these blocks. It is a way out of the charts and operate directly with ticks, which is how the market works.
I once built a strategy with these blocks, but it turns out that in the backtest on ticks, it's not the same as real ticks on the market. If it were possible to repeat similarly or identically what you do in the backtest on a real account, we will have an EA millionaire.
The secret I believe to be for this to happen is to know how the backtest simulates the historical ticks and do this calculation simulta- neously, but on the actual account.
In short ... make it work exactly what happens in backtestes, but in real account.
@tcanuto said in Time Bomb Job:
Ah ... these blocks ... if it were possible to operate exactly in real account what is possible in the backtest, we would have excellent setups with only these blocks. It is a way out of the charts and operate directly with ticks, which is how the market works.
I once built a strategy with these blocks, but it turns out that in the backtest on ticks, it's not the same as real ticks on the market. If it were possible to repeat similarly or identically what you do in the backtest on a real account, we will have an EA millionaire.
The secret I believe to be for this to happen is to know how the backtest simulates the historical ticks and do this calculation simulta- neously, but on the actual account.
Ah ... these blocks ... if it were possible to operate exactly in real account what is possible in the backtest, we would have excellent setups with only these blocks. It is a way out of the charts and operate directly with ticks, which is how the market works.
I once built a strategy with these blocks, but it turns out that in the backtest on ticks, it's not the same as real ticks on the market. If it were possible to repeat similarly or identically what you do in the backtest on a real account, we will have an EA millionaire.
You need to add the Once per bar block before the Buy now and Sell now blocks.
Interesting. It would make it a lot easier for us. For each version, I change the name of the project, such as project 1.2, project 1.3, etc.
Holla fxDreema. All right? Hope so.
I'm trying to do magic here in my project, but to no avail. I need the Check loss (last close) block.
Before that, would you have an alternative to it?
@engrled Try the Check profit (unrealized) block
@engrled said in Cannot Turn Off Block:
Hello,
I have a problem in where if profit reaches => 12 USD which is Block 6, should turn off Block 5.. But if profit falls below 12 USD, it again initiates Block 5 in where it should have been off already. Kindly see image.
Am I missing something?Thanks in advance for your respone!
Try these blocks that worked for me:
I'm also having the same problem.
I do not know if it's the Turn OFF blocks or the check Type (last winner) or Check profit (last closed) blocks.
