@fxDreema
Thank you very much.

What do you mean with "So if you have another block for another Symbol, then it works on a different Martingale"?

Thanks @fxDreema

I will compile again the EAs to check out their behavior.

Working with Partial Close works pretty well and I am getting similar results than using "OnTrade" conditions to move the SL.

Go on with your hard work improving the builder.

In blocks 23 and 29 try x> and x< instead of > and <

I added a new block "Order moved" under "on Trade"

https://fxdreema.com/shared/jX8wezXxc
This seems to work. I see fxdreema has implemented some nice new blocks, makes things easier 🙂

0_1529231575041_multicurrency.mq5

https://fxdreema.com/shared/LDVAFZSMd
0_1529308139027_7050fbbb-8e13-4fd5-a41d-2fdf34b07bfe-image.png
0_1529308148211_e4ca2926-56ac-4e24-8612-948aed4c614e-image.png

grid by AlphaOmega is based on trading probability if your strategy is based on that ... lets say your strategy is selling highs - and this is probability because the more highs you sell, the greater chance to hit one right ....
... but there are indicators which are blindly showing arrows or something similiar and this is not good way ...

Ok, I will try, thank you

Which project? Error messages?

Es sin duda de los mejores builders y más fáciles de usar. La gente del foro ayuda mucho y hay mucha información disponible en los diferentes posts. fxDreema ayuda mucho con los problemas que surgen a los usuarios.

No doubts. It is one of the best builders and easy to use. Forum users help a lot with the questions and the forum is plenty of info and examples. @fxDreema helps a lot with the issues,

More details?

I never set any value such as 200 in the code, so I suppose that this happens when you reach the maximum number of pending orders allowed by the broker. But if you did that, I think the broker will eventually complain 🙂

Well, the block is called "Indicator rise", so the idea is that the value for every candle is higher than the value of the previous candle. If you want some candle to be lower, then there is this "With exception of few candles" option.

So you can check the spread in a regular "Condition" block. I'm not sure whether the "Spread filter" block is slower or faster for the tester, because it has some more options, but you can test it and choose which block to use.

I think you need to be even more specific 🙂

"For each Closed Trade" can go to the yellow output if no trade has been selected, there are also some "Second output" settings in the block, you will see them. After that maybe place "Pass once" block, just in case.

I don't like how block 55 is connected. You can imagine that you still have 2 separate paths, but when 55 is connected like that those 2 paths are now merged. I'm also not sure why you have this block somewhere under "For each..." block. If the blue block can be above "For each...", I think it's better to put it there.

What is inside blocks 62 and 64?

Sorry I was wrong, but maybe this can help you

https://fxdreema.com/shared/BTkwL64Sd

De nada

You are welcome!

I just wanted to be explicit as there are times in the stochastic oscillator where either the %K or %D value hits the top or bottom and starts flattens out.
In which case the data being put out would satisfy %Kp = %Kc or %Dp = %Dc,
and if it satisfy this, I don't want any order being triggered.
You mentioned in point #2 you explained the condition with 'passes' or 'does not pass', but I think it goes deeper than that.
If you look at the block explanation:
alt text

It states that the yellow node is active when the 'opposite comparison is valid.'
Which means if the %Dp < %Dc is not satisfied,
then what passes next is %Dp > %Dc,
not simply that %Dp < %Dc does not pass.

For example while looking to get a buy order (after %Kp < %Kc is satisfied),
I explicitly need buy orders triggering when %Dp < %Dc and as well as %Dp > %Dc is satisfied.
But what da hell do I know, I just started using this 😛

I will look over my logic tree to weed out the redundancy for sure.
Any future post I'll utilize the tips you've given me, I think it's a better way of sharing ideas.
And I'll be sure to check out the tutorial you sent my way,
I think it'll be absolutely beneficial!

Thank you