0_1491221220884_block Ids.jpg
Updated.
This usually does the trick of auto-sorting the ID numbers .... BUT NOT ALWAYS !

ok now works again!👍

There was some block that was written in the database wrong. I don't know why, but I removed it. Find the project in your projects list.

can you try with new added block if it is working?

0_1488270798859_upload-2c1eac09-75f2-44e3-b53a-8942b7189ee6

.. note, MT4 will open only trades equally as selected Symbol in tester ... only MT5 can open multiple pair trades

@tcanuto said in Bug in blocks:

As I said, the problem for me was in the lines of codes quoted above. But I changed manually in the mql5 code and it was ok.

Now you need to review the blocks containing the above codes. Once you review and correct what you need, let me know and I'll be generating a new project to test...

Complementing what I had said earlier: These changes I made in the code were based on the best results of my EA, but I'm not sure if it's the correct way to use it here in fxDreema.
In this case you should evaluate if the blocks need correction or not.

https://fxdreema.com/forum/topic/4449/february-2017

I think that these problems are related. I am glad that the problem will be solved.

Best regards

This is true. I know that people who learn something very well eventually lose their ability to see from the newbie perspective. That's why most teachers are not very good teachers 🙂

In this case I will suggest to use 2 blocks for the 2 money managements. And some Constant that you can put into a Condition block above these blocks. Something like (ConstantName == Value->Boolean->True). I know that I'm recommending using more blocks right now, but this way you will be able to see what is happening in fxDreema (if you open the project in future) and also you can give good names to the input parameters.

@Didble-trader You can check the output code. But I never put anything intentionally to make the results different. Bugs are of course always possible, but it's important to say that some things are disabled in optimization - https://fxdreema.com/help/basics/testing-and-optimization-limits. Does the EA rely on chart objects?

I see. I was updating many blocks these days, maybe something wrong happened. I will fix the problem right now

Thank you very much for the help. I do not usually put strange characters, but in this case I put it without realizing it.

Now that works perfect.

If I make it like this, it fixes the problem also for other timeframes:

bool printed = false; void OnInit() { iClose(Symbol(), PERIOD_M1, 0); iClose(Symbol(), PERIOD_M1, 0); iClose(Symbol(), PERIOD_M5, 0); iClose(Symbol(), PERIOD_M5, 0); iClose(Symbol(), PERIOD_M15, 0); iClose(Symbol(), PERIOD_M15, 0); iClose(Symbol(), PERIOD_M30, 0); iClose(Symbol(), PERIOD_M30, 0); iClose(Symbol(), PERIOD_H1, 0); iClose(Symbol(), PERIOD_H1, 0); iClose(Symbol(), PERIOD_H4, 0); iClose(Symbol(), PERIOD_H4, 0); iClose(Symbol(), PERIOD_D1, 0); iClose(Symbol(), PERIOD_D1, 0); } void OnTick() { if (printed == true) {ExpertRemove(); return;} printed = true; Print("Value 1 = " + iClose(Symbol(), PERIOD_D1, 0)); Print("Value 2 = " + iClose(Symbol(), PERIOD_D1, 0)); Print("Value 3 = " + iClose(Symbol(), PERIOD_D1, 0)); Print("Value 4 = " + iClose(Symbol(), PERIOD_D1, 0)); Print("Value 5 = " + iClose(Symbol(), PERIOD_D1, 0)); }

... but it makes the EA to start slow and probably uses more resources, because it loads all timeframes. So I don't want to use this fix in fxDreema

Now everything works well, the Disk speed is faster than I would expect.

Such ugly situations happen sometimes when they decide to do something, let's say 1 - 2 times per year. Most of the time everything is ok. At least I know that if something happens, the administrator answers in minutes. I don't do that anymore in fxDreema, as you can see 🙂

@fxDreema ....you have made one hell of a powerfull software builder, personally i prefer the desktop, i find the layout better. obviously it's up to each and everybuilder to work out how best to utilise it. i decided rightly or wrongly a long time ago that no matter how many indicators are used, each trade has an equal chance of going up or down, disregarding spread, no matter what the indicators say. 100 blocks using a moving average and stoch really isn't going to do a great deal without knowing the overall direction of the whole market and then each group. I average out ten multiple pairs hedged to eliminate any chance of the broker messing with the MT4 plugin. They can mess with one pair but not ten on a multiple level.
As for programming in meta editor,, forget that, i'll leave that to the clever dudes, i just like pushing blocks around.

The error such as the following shows up in Eclipse MQL Editor when compiling a Fxdreema EA created in new version.
error Error on compilation! trade_manager.mq4
error missing EOF at 'input' trade_manager.mq4 Line 67 : 1
I had an older desktop version of fxdreema that worked just fine in old Eclipse MQL Editor . I formatted the USB Storage Media that contained its installer and now I can not seem to find it on fxdreema Site.

0_1485019563079_error.jpg 0_1485019594577_Eclipse.JPG

Never 🙂