https://www.forexfactory.com/showthread.php?t=532236

https://fxdreema.com/tutorial/builder/trailing-stop

In short, the trailing stop block should be places somewhere under "on Tick" so it can do its job on every tick. And what it does is to load each trade and check whether or not it needs to modify its SL... and modifies it if needed.

Well, managing risk is too general, you better explain what you mean 🙂

Each EA creates some trades on the same account, so each EA uses the same source of money. But EAs are separated by something called Magic Number. Basically when an EA creates a new trade, it gives particular Magic Number to that trade... and all trades that it creates. Then when it want to let's say delete a trade, it will only see those trades with it's own Magic Number and should not touch the others.

When MA50 is below MA200, this means that at some point in the past MA50 crossed MA200 from above to below. If you don't care when that happen, you can just check when MA50 is < MA200.

Working with objects, such as fibonacci, is a little bit different - https://fxdreema.com/examples#Chart-Objects

You both can't have more similar profiles 🙂

What is the problem, you tried to add the indicator and it didn't happened, or you don't know how?

There are blocks to place few pending order in grid, you tried them?

Oh, I tried to solve this problem many times, but it just happens. I tried NormalizeDouble(), DoubleToString() and what not, but this problem just appears when it wants.

MT4 was the winner and I think it still is... depends on what platform the brokers provide. MT5 started somewhere around 2010, but MQL5 was different and complicated for most people, so MT5 never got more popular than MT4. More than that, in MT5 we were only allowed to have 1 position per symbol. But not very long time ago they added "Use hedge in trading" option, so MT5 is now almost the same as MT4 in the way trades work. Also around that time they stopped developing MT4 anymore.

I'm not sure that those real ticks are really real. You know that in MT4 you can import history data from somewhere else, and you can import real ticks... but when you do that, you are using many gigabytes of data. Where are those gigabytes in MT5?

No, it's english only 🙂

For rectangle you need to provide 4 values - 2 price and 2 time values. Those are the coordinated of 2 points on the chart. Imagine that you are drawing it manually - the first point is where you started drawing it, and the second point is where you stopped.

0_1541871685422_f27ba58e-8de3-422f-b32d-d52d106e519b-image.png

I started drawing this rectangle from the upper left point, as the yellow arrow shows.

I'm trying to understand what you are trying to do, but I can't 🙂 Better don't give such names to the variables that are actually system words, it's confusing. The data type for Applied Price is ENUM_APPLIED_PRICE, it's not int.

As far as I know that's not possible, sorry. fxDreema is not designed to create indicators.

@andermaiden2nd Thanks for the response.

I've learned that basing everything on fxDreema's Once per bar makes it so you never need ticks again. When I test with ticks after optimizing with Open prices only the difference is often less than a dollar, net profit (<1%). Ticks are not necessary. Even with one minute charts, which is my preference. Buying tick data is simply unnecessary.
Besides, external data is not compatible with your broker. The only data to use is your broker data. And maybe not even demo data. One of my brokers demo data differs from live. The other, forex.com, is solid -- demo and live are exactly the same. So far, anyway.
I can't image getting away with using anything but your particular broker's data. This is not the stock market. Read your contracts. They reserve the right to modify the data, and they do, big time. fxDreema rounds UP after computing lot size if the result is less than 0.01. So if you plan on filling up an account with EAs and relying on fxDreema to compute lot size, expect margin calls. Or be sure to oversize your account or put manual limits on your EAs.
When you hit your margin limit and several EAs try to open trades they'll bust your limit.
😞 Your broker will be taking your money. So be careful.
The round up is apparently a feature having to do with too many new users not getting any trades.
I've had three EAs round up simultaneously on demo, that's how I found out about it.

You can try the trade "expiration" time. It might be surprising the results you can get with this simple condition.

Se recomienda empezar por los ejemplos disponibles en la web
It is recommended to beging taking a look at the examples given by fxDreema

https://fxdreema.com/examples#

@rpf1 said in help, Pullback Solution.ex4 no buffers:

anyone know how to make an EA with this indicator?
this indicator has no buffers, the arrows appear.
how to do an EA to scan the arrows and open the negotiation?

https://www.dropbox.com/s/v84bii4mulzml96/Pullback Solution.rar?dl=0

It may use objects instead of buffers, use select object by name block, and use your actions after that, witch means that it looks for the object and if it finds it it will act