I think in this case not, because just before opening a position I will call the block . I want to avoid processing time for unnessary calculation of lots if no position will be opened. - jist to go sure I have add lot-msg to see when the calc will happens, and it works as expected
thanks
Posts made by fisfro
-
RE: RUN BLOCK not at the start of the function treeposted in Questions & Answers
-
RE: RUN BLOCK not at the start of the function treeposted in Questions & Answers
just to be clear: the run block will be only called just before opening an position to calculate the lot size. So I think there will be no infinity loop in this case. So I can set the once per second block to something like 1000 or put the tree in the timer tab in order to avoid unneccesary proccesiing.
-
RE: RUN BLOCK not at the start of the function treeposted in Questions & Answers
@l-andorrร
Thanks a lot, now its clear
-
RUN BLOCK not at the start of the function treeposted in Questions & Answers

Hi there,
Is it correct if I would have a Run Block in another tree to the block as mentioned in the attached picture, that the block will start at the entry block 548592 or must the entry block be the first one in the tree?
Second where do you put such "remote" functions (tick, timer,...) if they have only be used for remote calls in order that they will be only executed, if there is a call by a Run Block function?
Thanks in advance!
-
RE: Missing block on next dayposted in Bug Reports
@jstap
thanky you very much for your help- I have just checked again. I cant delete vars which are not referenced anymore.
The search for the block id's will also show no result. So I guess the App will have a internal reference update problem. I guess the project has gone corrupt, which is not very funny.....Anyway- think positive....
-
RE: Missing block on next dayposted in Bug Reports
@fisfro
Please don't get me wrong, but I'm not that excited about sharing my project in this case, which has already consumed hundreds of hours of development. In this case, sharing won't be of much helpfull except you know the source code and can interpret the console errors correctly. And I think I'm confident that I can search for a block id on three tabs. If I need help with that, I can quit my job as a programmer....
I've also noticed in other projects that some variables that were referenced in deleted blocks cannot be deleted and it looks like I'm not the only one here in the forum who has problems with this. Otherwise there wouldn't be any tips like creating a new project or exporting and importing etc. here .
Also I think nearly nobody here can explain, why my project is missing blocks next morning when there is no delete-action for these blocks in history . So sharing of project will also not help for solving this problem I think.For the missing blocks I have one idea for a problem on my side:
Working on two computers , on one i add the blocks and on the second I started changes without refresh of the Chrome tabs. Usually I would expect an error message, that I would try to change an old version. But maybe there is no error msg. I will check that...Anyway thanks for your support.
-
RE: Missing block on next dayposted in Bug Reports
I will see here a lot of errors in the web app in the console- so I think the problem is not on my side
-
RE: Missing block on next dayposted in Bug Reports
@fisfro what do you mean with restarting the project? Do you mean to start from beginning?
-
Missing block on next dayposted in Bug Reports
Hello,
after opening the browser today two areas with multiple blocks are missing in my project. Using of history will not bring back the blocks. So I tried to delete de referring constants, but that is not possible, because I get the message, that there is a block using this var. I have searched in the browser on all tabs for the block numer and the browser shows one result, but there isn't this block visible.
Could it be, that there has been blocks hide?
I have seen often in the past after deleting a block, that I was still not able to delete in this block used constants. So it looks like that there a reference table will be not updated correctly.
Compiling will not solve the problem so far.
Thanks for any help in advance.
Robert