Posts made by fxDreema

Try this: https://fxdreema.com/shared/tprHFn18e

Look at the first two settings in "Draw Fibonacci" - they tell the block how to manage objects. The same block can create multiple objects and because each object has unique name, if the block is set up to create multiple fibonacci objects, each of them has different name - fibo1, fibo2, fibo3... Basically "fibo" is only the base name, which is then appended with a number. But in my version I selected those options in a way to create only one fibonacci with name "fibo" and then update it.

This is a long story...

Somewhere on the top of the code there is #property strict. How it will work without it?

https://fxdreema.com/shared/xY2ZUzIfe

You can check the number of trades / orders under "on Tick" and close everything ( Close trades, Delete pending orders) when that numbers is less that what is needed. Or under "on Trade" you can detect the event when some trade is closed and react on that moment.

Maybe using some counter? http://prntscr.com/9i6q5l

But the crossover... the one in "Condition" is a state - the relative position between 4 points who belong to 2 candles. The event of crossover is something else. Well, "Once per bar" turns that state into an event, but this event is "the first crossover within that candle". If you want to detect how many times one line crossed over another line, then few things must be considered, you must also look for how many times the lines went from crossover state to non-crossover state. And I don't know if this is what you want

I think you already know how to store values for later use. I'm not sure how engulfing candle can be found by using crossovers, but I can recommend you to be careful when you have blocks connected in paralel, as blocks 60, 70 and 80. I see that you gave them special numbers, but it's little bit more obvious what follows what if they are connected one after another.

But how does your project look like? I don't have an idea what blocks and what settings you are using.

I don't know where is your problem. Give more details about the problem.

The one from which you want to get absolute value

__
Where in the blocks can i do the StrToDouble to use the Number for Calculations?[/quote:1509cp0l]

Everywhere

I fixed the link. It looks that I have problems with some particular shared projects

Ok, I changed it like before. But it's not that hard to use those Constants. Just add some in the list and then right-click on some input field in the properties of any block. Really, the hardest thing to do here is to click the mouse like 2 times more and write the name of the constant. But then in the inputs of the EA you will see exactly what you wrote and the same Constant can be used in more than one block.

Here is my old implementation for Sure Fire that I have posted multiple times - https://fxdreema.com/shared/rShdtBC4e Those Formula blocks are there only because everything starts with 1, 3, 6. For 1, 2, 4 it would be easier to build and with less blocks.

https://fxdreema.com/demo/mt4-object-by-name
https://fxdreema.com/demo/mt4-object-in-loop

I mean that those checkboxes are suitable for quick optimizations, but for serious work - https://fxdreema.com/demo/mt4-constants

Now I see at the bottom that someone added extra stuff to the PDF and wrote this:

__I like this strategy because your overall position sizes (and therefore risk) end up being lower:

• Original sure-fire strategy position sizes: .1, .3, .6, 1.2, etc.
• This strategy's position sizes: .1, .2, .4, .8, etc.[/quote:2ef5wjra]

If I can make things even more simple, why not just using one trade at a time with fixed Stop-Loss and Take-Profit and Martingale lot size?

What we have at this time: http://prntscr.com/9genv4
Buy 0.1 + Sell 0.3 is equal to Sell 0.2. Why working with two trades when we can do it with only one. Just close that Buy and open Sell with lower lot size.

Ramsay, my feelings about Sure-Fire are very negative Yes, this strategy is often requested and I shared some example that I made long time ago, but it's just a stupid strategy with wrong inputs.

First of all, let's look at this row:
0.1, 0.3, 0.6, 1.2, 2.4, 4.8, 9.6, 19.2 and 38.4

If we remove the first 0.1, then it appears that each number is double the size of the previous one, like Martingale. But why the second value is 0.3 when the first one is 0.1? Because of this small things I added some extra blocks in the example, but why do I think that the author was wrong with his numbers...

If I am not wrong, because spanish-english translation in Google sucks, you want to limit the opened position to only one? Here look at the first example on the top https://fxdreema.com/examples/

In most cases when you use "pips away from open-price" you also need to use "once per trade/order", otherwise you are running "modify stops" over and over again.

Написах го вече, сигурно съм го писал и назад в темата поне 3 пъти, пиша го постоянно и го повтарям на кой ли не - когато се ползват розови блокчета с имена дето почват с малка буква, при MT4/MQL4 е силно препоръчително, да не кажа задължително да има един от "For each..." блокчетата някъде над него