Posts made by fxDreema

For which block are we talking about now?

Long time ago I did it in a different way. Now if "Condition" have this value in one of both sides, it does not pass at all. The idea is that because this number represents something that is not present, there is no need to continue. I have no idea to make it turn into 0 again, I think that this was stupid idea from the beginning

No trade - this checks if there is a trade currently running or not
Once per bar - this is a filter and can pass 1 time for the current bar - in the beginning of the bar, in the middle, in the end, nevermind. Only if this block is on top level it passes in the beginning.
Condition - this compares some things at the current moment and passes if the comparison is true
Sell now - when this block is run, it creates a new Sell trade

I think I got the problem in Firefox, so I will fix it now

Actually yes, but I guess this particular information is not very visible. It's here, the very last words at the bottom: https://fxdreema.com/help/-/you%20shoul ... indicators
But I also recommended this "Indicator tester" block multiple times, and this block can tell you what the buffer values are in realtime. And if you test it in Visual mode" you will also be able to see where and when the arrows appear. Sometimes they also disappear or reappear somewhere else.

I tried different things and I have no such problems. The only thing is that agter I add some indicator, if I then decide to add a new one - the "Choose file" field appears hidden, but this can be easily refreshed by clicking "My Indicators" again.

If someone ever finds how the problem happens, please, write to me about it

If buffers does not work for the current candle, try with Candle ID of 1, 2 or 3. In most cases indicators who draw arrows (well, they are also some kind of messages), this is the case, because those arrows actually appear on some of the previous candles.

No no no no no, not Terminal variables again. Those variables are not those Variables. Terminal variables are something completely different. The short suggestion is - don't use them. To use a Variable in Condition, go to Value -> Numeric (or Text, or whatever), right-click on the field and select the Variable. Again, Terminal variables are NOT the same as those blue Variables.

I don't know what happened to be honest. I got similar reports before, but I don't have any evidence that something is wrong with the EA. "Once per tick" is not needed by the way. Do you have some error messages in the log or something?

There are blocks to check how many trades or orders exists, and also those blocks have some filter settings to choose which trades or orders to work with or exclude.

Unfortunately. I have troubles reading translated text from spanish, I understand probably 10-20% of everything that is written. But I also hardly understand people who write to me in english, so I really recommend to everyone who wants to ask me something - just show me show screenshot. There is very nice software called Lightshot and I use it all the time to show different things to different people.

Mmmm I think you still don't know the real reason behind this effect It happens when some of the input parameters have incorrect data type. Because you sent me a copy of the EA you used, I can find this inside it:

__double retval=iCustom(SYMBOL,TIMEFRAME,"FL23", %(#FF0000)[false,false,false,"",false,31] ,0,SHIFT+IndicatorMoreShift());[/quote:24agnciw]

In red, these are the input parameters and "false" is boolean. Because I also got a copy of the indicator itself, I can see that it's first parameter is string, it's not boolean. Here is a screenshot:

http://prntscr.com/8ss8dn

You can fx everything by chosing "string" as a data type for the first parameter. The same as the 4th parameter. All the others look fine.

I am not aware of such limit. Maybe some particular indicator has problems? If you have such, send it to me for investigation

Option added

Maybe. The reason why I added this option was to be used with Martingale for example. Pending orders are a little bit different, because we can put many of them now and in the future who knows, they can fail to open because of "not enough money to trade". So not only the lot size, but their count really matters.

Why do you need that option?

Around the open price means that the open price is in the middle of the region.

The winning side depends on the type - buy or sell. For buys, the region is above the open price, for sells - below the open price. The losing side is the opposite.

Sorry, I don't really understand this mix of spanish and english Maybe some picture or project that shows the problem?

Well, it looks that when a pending order becomes a trade, there is no trace of that pending order anymore. I think that because of this: http://prntscr.com/8r1a3s - the same ticket number from the order is used for the trade.

But even if such thing is possible, there will be searching for information in "how it was opened" every time. Of course, there is always a way to use some Variables and store any information in them, but I don't like using Variables when working with trades and orders, because when the EA is restarted they are all reset and the information is totally lost.

I think that you can just use different Group number fot the trade itself, this will separate it from the other orders/trades. Or if you use "For each Trade" to select the oldest trade, which will probably be this one... well, only if this trade is 1, only if you don't have another similar groups of trades and orders.

Оставям си знак, че ще погледна това нещо с най-далечната поръчка.

Аз си поиграх малко, обаче по-различно - с най-старата губеща, ама нещо не се ми се получи модела.

Пробвах и друг модел - започвайки от най-старата поръчка да започне да събира профитите и ако излезе на +10 долара примерно, да ги затвори всичките. Това е малко като все едно да следиш за Equity-Balance и при определена разлика да се затваря всичко. Е да ама ако много често се правят поръчки бързо се достига до един момент в който повече не може.

Като знам как по принцип каквото и да се пробва все е на загуба, малко ме съмнява и твоя модел колко добре ще работи, ама що пък да не си поиграя

Try this: http://prntscr.com/8qnz8j