Posts made by fxDreema

Forever. There are no internal restrictions.

Something like that: http://fxdreema.com/shared/iplq0CcPc

Is it able to write new file if there is no old one in MT5?

Auto renaming files is, as I know, Windows behaviour.
To move around this I use two plugins for Firefox, but the little problem is that one of them is not working correctly with the newest 17 version of Firefox: http://fxdreema.com/documentation/downl ... ne%20click
Currently I'm trying to make a special plugin for browsers (Chrome, Firefox...) that will be able to automatically send files to their destination and overwrite them, similar to the local version of fxDreema.
And finally... the local version of fxDreema works without this problem

Once per trade can pass once per trade. Because of that, Pips Away (8 and 9) can be checked only once for every new trade. I think you want to connect it not before, but after Pips Away
Break Even block works for all the trades, it has it's own internal loop. Maybe you want to use "(in loop) Modify SL and TP" to set SL to 0 pips from the open price

In your example you have checked parameters for optimization and I cannot be sure what actual input values you are using in your MT5 locally. So I'm skipping it.
As a matter of fact, when I'm backtesting it, it creates buy limit or sell limit and yes, it trails them.

Look at the next example, it places 4 pending orders (buy stop, buy limit, sell limit, sell stop) at distance of 100 pips (above or below depends on the type of the order), and then it trails them. In "Trailing pending order" the value of "in pips..." is positive, but even if it is negative - there will be no difference because this value is always converted to positive. You will see how each one of the 4 orders is able to move when the price goes against it.
http://fxdreema.com/shared/2Gnz8BJOc

(in loop) Once per trade/order

In this project, blocks with names starting with "(in loop)" needs "Start trades loop" to be used, otherwise they will not work correctly.

This is example of using those blocks: http://fxdreema.com/demo/mt4-9975
On the left side - "Trailing stop" block, on the right side - the same trailing stop functionality with "(in loop)" blocks.

The idea is, "Start trades loop" creates a loop, it self executes itself as many times as many trades there are, and every time it loads the parameters of a trade, and those parameters are used from "(in loop)" blocks. Any "in loop" block can work any trade (buy, sell, any market...) and most of "in loop" blocks are universal for trades and pending orders, but what makes difference is the loop starter block.

Levels tester is only for temporary use, for you to see what happens on the buffers. This block is not needed in the project, and not a good idea to use it as indicator (because it looks like indicator).

Well, in examples that I give, I'm not trying to exaxtly make the final EA, I want to only show how to do something.
Every EA works basically like this:

......... => Condition 1 -> Action 1
On Tick => Condition 2 -> Action 2
......... => Condition 3 -> Action 3

Tick is received, and this causes some things to be checked (conditions) and some actions to be taken.

Also you can read here a little bit more about crossover: http://fxdreema.com/documentation/proje ... er%20works

When using indicators, the key is to know what happens on their buffers. Every indicator is different, but if you know what it returns to the EA, you can then built the strategy correctly. And that's why I made this "Levels tester" block, to test fast and easy one of the buffers and know what really happens there.

Build 028 is out. Now when fxDreema starts, the first thing to do is to try to write and delete a temporary file. If it fails, an error message appears with explanation of how to make it to run with administrative privileges.

The latest version is available here http://fxdreema.com/desktop

This "Error: Failure to create new expert advisor" appears when the program (fxdreema.exe) cannot create files/folders, have no permissions to do it. This happens when UAC (User Account Control) is enabled for Windows.
Try to run the shortcut with "Run as Administrator" enabled -> www.sevenforums.com/tutorials/11841-run ... rator.html (there are many options listed, I prefer option five or six)

SuperTrend_AGOUZ also have two buffers, but their values are either 1 (visible) or 2147483647 (not visible). In Hi-Lo the values were: Price Level (visible) or 0 (not visible). You have similar indicators in different formats.
In "Condition" there is an option that looks like "2147483647 => 0 " and if you set it to "Yes" for SuperTrend_AGOUZ, it will behave like Hi-Lo.

About the modifications... my answer should be No. Especially if you use local version, which is 20-days old. Condition should pass only when the condition inside is true, but not when it's false. Maybe if you give me more details about these weird things that happens...

Hi-Lo is similar to PSAR, but it has two buffers. When buffer0 is 0, buffer1 is > 0 (price level). And when buffer0 is > 0 (price level), buffer 1 is 0.
You can use "Levels tester" block to see how buffers work. Connect it with "Just pass" under "on Tick", and load Hi-Lo custom indicator inside.
What I found is, when this indicator places the new color, it can change it's decision shortly after. Maybe it's a good idea to work with Candle ID = 1 (on the previous candle, which is already finished), otherwise you will get false signals.

This might help: http://fxdreema.com/shared/q4J4vXjRc
Both conditions are different, but the result is the same.

Maybe it is something with your time blocks (those on the top) and their input settings that makes one of them to not pass. "Hours filter" most probably. Use "Draw arrow" to detect if they pass. Then use it after "Condition", and so on...

Do you have "status Working" or "status Starting" or "status Stopped" at the top of the chart?

I backtested this and there are orders. Unfortunately, some stupid error appears as well (order modify error), but the point is - the EA does something.
Why don't you try to connect "Draw arrow" block somewhere, just to know that it works.

Demo or backtest?
No positions, no orders, no errors... nothing at all?