Posts made by fxDreema

First you can change this to 0, so the EA could see the manual orders: http://prntscr.com/hvgndj
Or, in the blocks there is an option to see only manual orders (where the Group settings are for blocks like "No trade" for example).

Here is something that I just made - https://fxdreema.com/shared/ELsR5b3od
To have pairs of trade-order, my idea is every time we create an order, its Comment to be the same as the ticket number of the trade. Well, the Comment is a string and the ticket number is an integer, which means that maybe there is a situation when conversion bug happens, but in my test it worked.

All MM methods are positioned right into the blocks who create new orders and the calculations of the lot size is made just before the order is created. The lot size that is calculated remains "inside the block".

And most of those MM methods read the latest lot size (of the last closed trade for example) to use it to calculate the next one. You want to separate that lot size into multiple orders, so basically you can't use those MM methods, they don't work for you.

But why do you want to make 3 orders instead of 1? Is it because you think that if you make something more complex, it could magically work better? Because I don't believe in that

When it comes to looking at the past candles and make some calculations, and then print something on the chart, this is clearly a job for some custom indicator. Unfortunately I can't offer indicators builder. In theory it can be done in the EA as well, but it will be not optimized at least. The code in the custom indicators is structured a little bit differently, so new calculations are made only when needed. It's much harder to do something like this in an EA.

This was never built in. Renko EAs and Indicators are custom made and can be found around the internet. They create an offline chart and they "inject" ticks in this chart, so it looks alive. But the candles looks different and that's why it is a separate chart, it's not over the original chart.

Can this be backtested?

I wonder what values are added to the variables, for example in block 3. What is the profit for the trade there? I can suggest to put let's say Comment block after this block to see the value, but immediately after Comment to connect Delay, so each iteration of the loop would be paused for a while.

Those crazy rays also here: https://fxdreema.com/forum/topic/5309/draw-line/4

Try this: https://fxdreema.com/shared/nCuL1qWV

I added XAU_USD = 0.1 in the rules for this example (I have _ between XAU and USD in my MetaTrader). The idea of these rules is that you can decide what it the size of 1 pip. Well, for the gold I think that they measure the movements in cents, not pips

Well, it is free, but limited. There is no period where everything is unlocked. By default you can export projects with less than 10 connections for free.

Looking at the code, I think that this "Flilter by pending type" parameter in the "trades" block is there for nothing, it is unused. But in fact these blocks exist from the very beginning (for years) and I'm a little bit afraid to touch anything in them

Do you have an example? Sometimes the problem is not in the block you think, but in the way you connected it. I guess that many people are using those blocks and I don't remember complains about them lately, so I think that in general they work properly.

There is a bug that I think it's a little bit harder to fix, but I will try to fix it. Change the Constants type to int, because buffer numbers are actually integer values, they are not strings.

When I wrote this topic I think the Bitcoin price was somewhere between 2000 and 3000 dollars. Over 15000 now and I still believe that cryptocurrencies will grow. Guys, forget about this Forex stuff and buy and hold some cryptos, I think you will be much better in the future

Wait, what are those patterns?

In fxDreema you can of course check some candle levels, very basic stuff. Also there is a block "Single candle templare" or something like that. Years ago I made a special block for patterns recognition, but I dropped it because I was not happy with it. Now I believe that those complex calculations with prices should be made with indicators, not in the EA. Mostly because the indicators are better optimized for that and it's pain in the butt to make something like this in an EA.

fxDreema, at least in my eyes, is good for trying some basic trading strategies quickly, to check if something is working or not. Well, unfortunately no strategy works all the time, so whatever works now will surely not working some time in the future

I think I don't understand the question, I'm confused

is this name EURUSDf proper with this "f" at the end? Because I think that this error is a response from the broker's server, which is a result from the request of MetaTrader (of the EA). The EA itself just says to MetaTrader to open whatever trade, but if the symbol is not correct, then the server would respond that way. Or at least this is what I think.

Well, on the left side of the condition the minute number is turned into a string, so you have a string at the end. Comparing string with a numeric value (integer, double...) normally works, but it's obviously not the right thing to do.

Try this:
Print("10" < 5);

It returns true. I guess that some conversion happens for the string, because any number below 10 works, but when the string ends with 0 that 0 is probably considered as nothing and removed.

Is this Binary Options broker? Because I am used to see reports of this error on BO brokers...

Yes, those values are comparable. In the programming world (and not only) the time is represented in this interesting format as a number of seconds since 1.1.1970. This is also called Epoch time and you can see the current number here: https://www.epochconverter.com/

"2017.12.04 17:00" is just a string, a text and the number behind this is 1512406800. In the block Time 1 for the object is get as an integer number, as well as the Open Time of the trade.

Interesting question, but I don't know how

I tried this EA and it shows correct results to me http://prntscr.com/hmo4m1

Each Comment block creates its own text. So I added options to put the text in another corner, so you can have 4 Comment blocks that will not overlap. This is how it is now