@jstap ok then, really bad. Anyways, thank you for your feedback, really appreciate.

@jstap sorry, now it looks like below, but still no objects of the indicator found:

@jstap the object list is empty:

@jstap How can i read these indicator objects? You mean with the "object created" block in the "on Chart" tab?

@jstap I tested the indicator itself in the strategy tester. The signals suddenly stop working after some time, see below. Probably this is the reason why the EA also cannot read the signals?

But why are they working in live? I am confused!

@jstap no acutally i get all the buffer signals, but in that case the mouse cursor (white vertical line) was exactly at the position of these 3 values. (green dot, green line, red line). When i move the mouse then i will get all the other signals as well.

So i cannot even get the green and red lines signals which are contiuous signals.
Could it be that fractal signals are hard to read out from the buffers?

@jstap I don´t think, there is an indicator problem (check the mq5 code).
And: yes, all the buffer values can be seen in the data window.

Is there anyone who can explain, how to get the arrow signals of an indicator in general? What is the correct way? Unfortunately in the tutorials i have seen examples how to get the signals from indicators with continues signals (like MACD, ADX etc) but not how to get arrow signals which are interrupted.

In my case it would be sufficient to know when a dot appears. Of course, it would be perfect to read out the value as well.

Here is the source code of the indicator:
fractallevels.mq5

https://www.mql5.com/de/code/viewcode/732/149215/fractallevels.mq5

@jstap Thanks for that proposal using only "modify variables" and "comments" block. But this also didn´t worked. Still no values of the buffers.

@jstap Of course, here it is:
https://fxdreema.com/shared/YiB8jvEad

Probably you have a better idea what is wrong here? Probably the arrows are objects, not buffers or the buffers are arrays? No clue.

I did (see above screenshot), but didn´t worked. That´s why i am asking.