Topics created by Trader3487

I get the point, if the spread was zero, then that hedging wouldn't produce any loss. I'M using Admiral Markets as broker but that does not influence my backtestings because I'm using historick tick data from Dukascopy and the Tickdata Suite program which means that I have to enter manually the right settings for the strategy tester to emulate the real spread conditions of my broker. I recomend using Historic data as it changes drastically the quality of the results. Now if you are using Tickdata Suite and you want to set the spread to zero, remember to also set the commision to zero. Are you using Metaquotes tick data or Dukascopy tick data?

OK @miro1360, that makes sense. I mostly use candle 1 close. My analysis seems to accurately reflect what I am trying to achieve and I don't get 99% accuracy so I think I am good to go... I have found a variance between results on candle close and tick data, I will continue to forward test to find out which has greater consistence.

yes, the comment field of buy now/sell now block is what I was looking for. Thank you very much 🙂

No. I use the word "Condition" to point to all these... things that you can find there. They are also accessible from other blocks.

Some objects have 1 price (arrow, horizontal line), others have 2 prices (trendlines, rectangles, fibonacci...), others have 3 prices (triangles..). In the blocks where you create objects, you can see how many prices and times it uses. This is different for each object.

wow, that was easy! Thanks 🙂

CHART_IS_OFFLINE is new constant. Well... I think more than 6 months old. Maybe you have some old MT4 installation 😮

Or I can make it to highlight these blocks 🙂

Big projects are pain for me. I often look at projects that have too many blocks and cloned groups of blocks. In the world of programming this is really bad practice. I'm not sure how, but I will try to find some way to minimize this. For now I can only recommend - reuse the same blocks with the help of Variables, instead of cloning groups of blocks.

No luck, the extension was rejected because NPAPI plugin is used to make the browser able to write files to the local file system. This was the only way I was able to find back in the day. Now...

http://prntscr.com/4zt9s8
http://prntscr.com/4zt9nv
http://www.chromium.org/developers/npapi-deprecation

...they say Good Bye to NPAPI. They listed some alternatives, but I was not able to find this exactly. So... I don't know. At least it's still working under Firefox (I'm working with it personally). The local version is also alternative.

Well, I almost abandoned these blocks and I think I will remove them. These blocks are like indicators, but they are not indicators, and it's better to use some indicators instead 🙂

You can always define local variables in the main code, they will appear in the output code of the block in it's own function. But these will not appear as input parameters in fxDreema 🙂

Yes, and for gray output ~error~ should work. But there are bugs sometimes 🙂

I see the difference 🙂

oh - that helps a lot thanks!

MT4 -> Tools -> Options -> Notifications

I don't know, I also feel all the good and bad things, for example I love to add new blocks, but I hate to connect blocks. This one - to export files... yes, it's some action, but one of these that I actually like 😮

great, thanks a lot!

There are some things to be considered...

Input parameters should not be entered, they are automatically created depending on the input parameters you create on the right side. Use ~next~ where it should go to execute next blocks and ~inext~ if you want to have yellow output. Always use 1 ~next~ and 0 or 1 ~inext~, it's not that more than 1 can't be used, but it's better to be 1.

I can suggest to write something, save, and see what code is going out of the block. Notice that when you save it, it does not check for errors, I was always too lazy to implement this, but I'm using this Studio and it's enough for me and obviously there are no many other people using it, so... I imagine that I'm the only one that is using it :)))

I looks that it's there, but it's probably not.
In the beginning I started to add blocks to MT4 and to MT5 separatedly, and I was using different ID names for some blocks sometimes. For example NoTrades vs NoPositions. But I had no idea to allow mixing MT4 and MT5 blocks, back then there was no even copy-paste. Now I'm still not 100% into that idea, to mix MT4 and MT5 blocks. I suggest to remove those blocks that are missing and replace them. And also check conditions if something is used in MT5 that is not available in MT4.

that's it, only for that ea. It's working now - thank you! 🙂

Now I'm preparing few new blocks to work with the chart, I guess very soon.
What I can suggest is to check in the source code what is the timeframe that is selected, it should work. The problem is that names are shifted with one step, so H4 is actually H6, H6 is H8 and so on. When the fix comes it will not need any intervention, you can actually see on the project you posted that it now shows H6 🙂