Posts made by fxDreema

Unfortunately, I think that there is no big difference between the EAs above and this PDF strategy Well, it is martingale obviously, it's using x2 lot size, not x3, but let's take a deeper look...

The real problem is written inside the PDF:
__Continue this sequence until you make a
profit. Lots: 0.1, 0.3, 0.6, 1.2, 2.4, 4.8, 9.6, 19.2 and 38.4[/quote:knu2daie]

It's easy to write this - just open 19.2 lots and you will be fine! But can you open such amount of money now?

Do you know how big is 1 pip when you have opened 0.1 lots in EURUSD? It's $1.
Let's take a look how many dollars you are "ready" to lose...

0.1 lots, 60 pips loss -> $1 x 60pips = $60
0.3 lots, 60 pips loss -> $3 x 60pips = $180
0.6 lots, 60 pips loss -> $6 x 60pips = $360
1.2 lots, 60 pips loss -> $12 x 60pips = $720
2.4 lots, 60 pips loss -> $24 x 60pips = $1440
4.8 lots, 60 pips loss -> $48 x 60pips = $2880

$5640 are lost at this moment...

9.6 lots, 60 pips loss -> $96 x 60pips = $5760

oops... this one was bigger than all the previous 6 losses!

There is a HUGE chance of hitting... say 5 stop-losses one after another with such a small SL/TP. Will it hit 6 stop-losses - for sure! Will it hit 7 stop-losses - for sure! What about 10 stop-losses in a row - no problem!

But you can try martingale with giant SL/TP - more than 300 pips. There will be another problems like the cost of having a trade running for weeks.

In other words this PDF strategy isn't that "awesome" But I truly believe this simple PDF file is AWESOME for the website that is mentioned many times inside. Wow, I should make the same PDF for fxdreema.com

I just updated the last post...

This (uses history trades loop, constants and two "Formula" blocks sharing the same "Result" variable)
http://fxdreema.com/shared/GON95kl3b
or this, which looks simpler
http://fxdreema.com/shared/Xk6A18zme

Of course, this EA eventually leads to "Not enough money"

If only type (buy or sell) and profitability are needed, look at "Checkup" category.

On the other hand this logo is a signal that the EA comes from fxDreema. I wonder how long your Comment is, but because you are using direct way to put information in it, why just not put "\n" at the very beginning to start with one line offset?

"Weekday filter" block.

Indicators also changes because of ticks. Everything changes only because of ticks, so there is no need to repeat something when there are no ticks. If you repeat some conditions 10 times between two ticks, the results will be the same, because indicators depends on ticks.
If you want to repeat something say 10 times within a tick, find a block named "Free loop...". There is also one named "Sleep". But I can't find any reason to do this

When creating EA, the main part of it's content is executed on every tick. That's why it is EA - somethings that monitors changes and takes actions when needed.
You can see 5 buttons above the main workfield and one of them says "on Tick" and it's normally active. What you place in this workfield will be executed again and again when a new tick comes.

Known bug, will check it some beautiful day

Fixed. Thanks for the report.

I thought that this is a bug, but it is really a feature... from old days Anyway, removed. Available also in build 030 (re)uploaded just a minute ago.

Oops, missed that post

I have no idea why is this happens, and again... if I see it here, I will fix it, but I don't know how to replicate it on my PC

No, variables and constants should not be linked in any way with this problem.

When you load some project, it should write it's ID into ".lastloaded.fxdb" file. That's how it remembers the last loaded project. The next time fxDreema starts, it looks inside ".lastloaded.fxdb" to know what project to load. If there is no such a project present, this warning message appears.
But this never happened to me, I think. Yes, it's possible that I'm missing something here, who knows... Can you tell me what's inside your ".lastloaded.fxdb" file, or at least is the record inside pointing to one of your existing projects? This is pure text file basically and it can be opened with Notepad.

Out of Lorenc Software website...
__
Licensing:

If you are interested in using this product after expiration of your 10 day trial period then you can purchase a valid digital license directly via StrategyDeveloper. There are these licenses available:

1 month / 39 USD
3 months / 99 USD
6 months / 159 USD
12 months / 259 USD

[/quote:13026rwr]

Guys, I wonder how many programmers out there hate me. So don't wonder if I raise the prices in fxDreema to match this market

No, I don't mean competition. I wonder if it worth it, because taking care of one more platform in the future does not make thighs better for the existing ones :))
And by the way, if we compare MT4/MT5 to jForex - is jForex better below M1, or it's just another aaaaaalmost accurate thing?

Oh no, I don't like bugs

There is a file named ".lastloaded.fxdb" inside "fxDreema/Data/experts" and it should contain the ID of the last loaded project. What's in yours ".lastloaded.fxdb" and is this file... locked or something?

Without deletion it sounds like a bug for me, but unfortunately it does not happen to me at the moment

This message appears after you delete some EA, but after the deletion, no other EA was loaded, so the database still points to the old EA that is no longer exist. It's nothing bad, especially when you know that you just deleted some EA.

And this "blank" EA is one of yours, created some time ago - the one that fxDreema choosed to load instead of missing one.

If you delete all the EA's, a new "Empty" one will be created. In some situation you can see "Unnamed" one, which is because of some bug that I did not investigate, but "blank" one is your creation.

In any case, you don't have really missing EA's? No loss of data out there?

I can, in theory, create another set of blocks for another trading language. The last time I had jForex installed on my PC was nearly at the time I started to program fxDreema, so I'm not really aware what are the similarities and differences between their API and MQL. What I know is that jForex can also import .mq4, but once I received a report from someone telling me that this conversion does not work with fxDreema's EAs.

One of the most important features from MQL used in fxDreema's API is "static" variables. There are many functions used as a piece of memory because they have "static" variable inside. I'm not sure that JAVA supports something like this natively.

Do you think that many people prefer to use jForex, or it is just something exotic? Let's say that currently there are 2 big sets of blocks that I have to worry about (MQL4 and MQL5), then there are 2 platforms (web and local), then there are 2 browser plugins (Connector for Firefox and Chrome)... so... if there is some other programming language out there, it's good to be the one that many people prefer to use

Oh yes, the power of automatiozation
So, basically, 0.2 no longer works on your PC? Is it possible that I can investigate it on your PC... if you don't have what to do?

Good explanation of the problem, really thank you

If 0.1 works well, work with it. The difference between both versions is the size of the .dll file inside, which is smaller in 0.2 version because I've made some changes in Visual C++ environment... but I'm not really sure what changes

Well, I think I have to wait for that problem to start happening here. Meanwhile, what is your free RAM normally? On both of you