Not completely sure I get the idea. If I understand it correctly, you mean something like this:
Example 1.
Example 2.
Is this correct?
@pipskok Although unlikely, I found over the years that a fxDreema project can be corrupt. Considering it is a small project, create a new one with new blocks from scratch and try again.
Easy. Just select the name of the object with that specific level and delete it. Each object should have a unique name to identify it. You can also use number. That make it easier.
That would mean doing it for you. 
I will help you, but you should do your part first too.
Is this the whole project or just part of it? This part is perfectly fine. I guess the problem is in the data used to do the test.
This is the second reply for the exact same question. Please don't duplicate questions.
You need a custom loop with a variable to do that. Are you familiar with them?
Because you are telling the bot that all condition on the right branch can be applied to open buys and sells on equal terms. What is the point of that? Then remove the buys branch on the left. Why two different sets of conditions are necessary to open a buy while only one set of conditions is applied to open a sell?
Technically, the whole strategy can be done with variables only. So are you sure you still need the rectangles?
Yes, I fully understand how it works. The problem is that building such a structure is not that easy. Have you tried an initial version? We can begin from there.
I see it is a bot made for MT5. I'm almost sure that the problem is a change in the fxDreema code. Sadly that is a very common thing here. I recommend to build the blot from scratch and test it. The new mql5 code should be fully incorporated into it. Otherwise, if you did no change at all, it should work normally.
Do you really need the rectangles? Why not using variables only instead? That will make the EA far more efficient.
Sospecho que el cuadrado debe ser visible por motivos estéticos, ¿verdad? Es mejor usar variables y evitarlo. El bot será más rápido y eficiente.
Can you please share the link to the project to take a look at it?
@baxpar As I replied in my previous post. 
As I pointed out. You need to create a completely separated structure doing that. Additionally, They do not need necessarily to be connected together. They can be separated depending on your current structure. There is no simple description to be embedded in one block or two, if that is your question.
Yes. That happens in block 72, but please notice that I used an input parameter that limits the number of iterations to be considered. I'm not sure you need it too.
Block 3 should specify sell positions only and not buys too.
@DoctorK Ok. and what is the maximum/minimum distance required for the condition to be met?
@abasali Then I'm not sure I can be helpful. If I understand what you want correctly, you need to know if a trade will be using less than 10% of current balance's margin BEFORE it is open, right?