You're partially right. As soon as the 'RUN BLOCK' is executed, the action will be moved to the destination block. In your example it will be 584592, regardless of its position in the block tree. Then the action will continue from there as per your current structure below it until the last one (block 318077). I assume this example above in in the 'on tick' tab. This means the next block tree will be executed accordingly and, potentially, the same 'RUN BLOCK' will be executed again, so you need to be careful not to create an infinite loop that way. I hope this will also be useful for your second question.
Posts made by l'andorrà
-
RE: RUN BLOCK not at the start of the function treeposted in Questions & Answers
-
RE: Corrupted my EAposted in Bug Reports
Agreed. Try to use a different browser and that wouldn't happen.
-
RE: Problem in optimization after software updateposted in Questions & Answers
This is the second thread you created for the exact same problem. Please stop duplicating threads.
-
RE: Disruption in optimization after software updateposted in Bug Reports
Is the issue limited to optimizing or is backtesting also not working?
-
RE: want to create EA that put order on custom indicator(arrow,dot etc)posted in Questions & Answers
Is it the same indicator used in this thread?
-
RE: MACD Divergence with Zigzag Indicatorposted in Questions & Answers
Did you import it into fxDreema and are buffers correctly identified? That's the first step.
-
RE: Working with SMT divergence : how to compare values to trace trendline (the SMT) ?posted in Questions & Answers
Definitely you need a custom code array to do that. There is no 'easy way' to do it with fxDreema blocks, I'm afraid. I suggest you to contact roar or jstap. I'm not a programmer and you definitely need one.
-
RE: Buying and selling one after the otherposted in Questions & Answers
You need to add a 'No trade' block on top of both block trees to avoid that.
-
RE: Best Range Filters or Trend Findersposted in Questions & Answers
That depends on your strategy. Any combination of those can be effective depending on your approach to the market. In my opinion, looking for trend in the higher TF and triggering in the lower is generally better.
-
RE: BASIC CRITERIA! I'm not able to solve/implement thes criteria, HELP!!posted in Questions & Answers
@nielhalam And you can also remove that 'AND' block. It is redundant.
-
RE: EA based on MACD lines and RSI levelsposted in Questions & Answers
@facto When you are connecting one block to the next one, you are making the bot to execute those conditions one immediately after the other. If they need to be executed in different moments in time, they need to be executed in separate block trees, not in the same one as they are now.
If you need to use different setting on your indicators you can manually type the new values on the appropriate condition block or create some constants to use them as input parameters as is explained here.
-
RE: hedgingposted in Questions & Answers
Ok. The I recommend using the search too in forum. Select the keyword 'hedge' in the title and you will find many threads dedicated to that.
-
RE: Buying and selling one after the otherposted in Questions & Answers
Do you mean opening a buy when a sell is closed and the other way round?
-
RE: TENGO MUCHOS BOTS QUIEN GUSTE ALGUNO PUEDE PASARLE LOA CODIGOS ...HECHOS EN FXDREEMAposted in Questions & Answers
@yopimer746764 Una oferta interesante. Muchas gracias por compartir. ¿Son exitosos en el mercado real?
-
RE: EA based on MACD lines and RSI levelsposted in Questions & Answers
Some hints:
- You can remove those 'AND' blocks. They are redundant.
- Connect block 7 to block 1's orange output dot, not the yellow one.
- You are requesting the bot fond for both conditions ho happen at the exact same time. This is why you get so few trades.
-
RE: Stop loss based on highest priceposted in Bug Reports
Did you check if price at that moment is BELOW the requested highest price? Because if it doesn't, no SL can be positioned there.