Posts made by l'andorrà

@dadilula Exactly. It is not fxDrteema's fault, but MT4's design.

You should use a 'once per bar' block on top of both block trees. You don't need them to be checked every tick.

Sort of. This is a known issue on fxDreema. The problem is reusing (ie copying) old/previouis blocks from the same or other projects. That creates corrupt blocks that mess everything up. I recommend to use new blocks only to avoid that, although it make everything far slower.

And this is why reviewing the blocks would definitely help.

@Mani13 You can try using this:

Do you mean drawing a single line that evolves in time? I don't see the logic of using two. Are you trying to fin a price range maybe? A dynamic one?

@InfinityGlobal jstap is right. I'm not here as much time as I would like. The short answer to your question is yes, your project is feasible. However, it cannot be done with unclear or ambiguous conditions. This is the first lesson I had to learn when I began in fxDreema long ago. I'm happy to help you, but that will take a long time if you are patient enough. Again, jstap's recommendation is the best one. Create smaller segments of your project and then we will be able to review them here.

@tec-nacks If that is possible I want to know how it works!!

@raimi89 You need to use this block on top of all those condition blocks deleting objects:

Yes, that is possible. What criteria should be used to draw them?

The short answer is yes, all bots can be done with fxDreema. The problem is the time and effort involved in doing it. It is a very complex structure that cannot be implements with a few blocks, if that is your question.

@ambrogio Well seen. I didn't see that!

Can you please share the link to the project?

Not sure I get the idea. Could you please provide a numeric example? I would appreciate something like this:

1. Open price, initial SL and initial TP levels.
2. Then price moves up/down and SL/TP should be here...
   That would help.

You're welcome.

You block is already doing that.

@Poowanas-0 You can do it this way:

You need very specific rules before trying that. Just the first 3 ones I'm thinking off:

1. Is that range fixed or dynamic?
2. Can candle wicks break through both ends or not?
3. Are you thinking of market executions or pending orders?

That depends on the source of your back test data. If that data belongs to a different broker, then there can be no similarity at all. If they are, then it depends on your broker's real conditions. You can have very nice data but brokers still messing your trades. So the general answer is there is no expected 100% similarity...ever.

Impressive!!!