@mozayfx2019 Are you sure it is wrong?
Posts made by l'andorrà
-
RE: Right aligned or right justified textposted in Questions & Answers
@general-melchett Interesting question. I would also want to know.
-
RE: Comment uglyposted in Questions & Answers
@tulefi I would make two more changes. I would substtute block number 1 by another 'pass' block and would number it as 6. That way it will e the las one to be executed each tick.
On the other hand, I would define the origin of group 1 for sells. It is clearly defined for buys via the block number 21. I would specify that block for buys only and then use a 'no trade' block for sells only below block 3.
-
RE: Sell and buy stop mobileposted in Questions & Answers
@ale That is not a trivial EA to do. Do you have any initial project to begin with?
-
RE: Finally, News Filter for MT5 in 1 easy to use Block !!posted in Tutorials by Users
@quantengineer Interesting question. Never built a custom block. Is there any option in fxDreema to download it?
-
RE: Problem with MT5 custom indicatorposted in Questions & Answers
@ambrogio I think you should email him directly. I'm afraid he doesn't read the forum very often except for the bugs forum.
-
RE: Why does the input custom indicator have no input or output buffers?posted in Questions & Answers
@eren-0 That indicator's code is not as fxDreema is designed. You should read these tutorials in order to try to fix that:
https://fxdreema.com/forum/topic/4208/tutorial-06-my-indicators-in-fxdreema
https://fxdreema.com/forum/topic/9105/tutorial-working-with-ex4-ex5-indicator-file -
RE: My EA does not close losing positions sometimes???posted in Questions & Answers
@piotras10000 Quick note: Block 5 is unnecessary as there are two blocks connected below. That reason why trades are not closed when condition is true is due to that 'once per bar' block on top. Remove it and it will work normally.
-
RE: I share loss strategyposted in Questions & Answers
@rodrigo-ortuzar You are using a ping block unconnected to a 'for each position' block. You should remove it and duplicate the whole structure on the 'on trade' tab. One for buy position created only and another one for sells.
-
RE: URGENT: BUY COUNT CONDATIONposted in Questions & Answers
@smartcity-0 Do you mean open or closed trades? Are they supposed to be open at the same time?
-
RE: can anyone help me change the sell buffer to buy and buy to sell on the metatrade4 built-in heiken ashi indicatorposted in Questions & Answers
@duelistking You will need a mql4 programmer to do that. If you do not find any here you can always try it at fiverr.com.
-
RE: Move confirmed with breakout above moving average of volumeposted in Questions & Answers
@maxsydney I know for sure there were several changes on MT5 since, but I'm afraid I have no idea how they affected his code.
-
RE: Buttons on MT4 screen to fine tune EAposted in Questions & Answers
@sirluk Ok. Do you have any initial project to begin with?
-
RE: Buttons on MT4 screen to fine tune EAposted in Questions & Answers
@sirluk Thank you for your support. Do you mean that selecting one button should remove the other two from the chart? Why not simply having them all visible and using only those you need?
-
RE: Purchase planposted in Questions & Answers
@mesmerist You can build unlimited EAs and not only 30 (max 3 per day). But the most important one is that you can build them as big as you need and not only with a maximum of 10 connections.
-
RE: Urgent! Please How Do I Achieve This Conditionposted in Questions & Answers
@plentygrazes The problem is with the moment you want the EA to open the trade. If you want the engulfing to be confirmed rthe EA should work on candle ID 1-2 but apparently you are looking for that to happen before it is confirmed. Which option is the one you want?
-
RE: I share loss strategyposted in Questions & Answers
@rodrigo-ortuzar Blocks 1 and 4 are unnecessary. Just remove them. However, that structure will open a new trade every single tick. I guess you want just 1, right? Then you should use a pink 'once per trade/order' block instead.