@sharat125 I think I get the idea. However, I don't like to use the 'draw fibonacci' block. I tried it in the past and it is not as intuitive as it should be. I would recommend to use direct math calculations instead and variables. You know where top and bottom of the fibo should be. Insert those prices into variables and then calculate the requred % as a simple division. That should skip all drawing part.
@gozey Sorry gozey, I simply lost your reply. I confirm the problem is with your indicator. No buffer is correctly identified by fxDreema. Did you try to manually created them as per the tutorials in links I suggested?
@firima80 This is one way to do it. In this example, if you lose 30% of your balance, al trades are closed and the EA is removed from the chart:
@ertuke Not sure what you exactly mean by 'error'. Do you mean lost trade?
@bmcghee Can you please share the link to both projects instead of uploading the files? That would make it way easier to look at.
@sharat125 This is the second thread in which you request the same issue. Please focus on one thread only and don't duplicate them.
@sharat125 Can you please share the link to the project instead of uploading the file? That will make it easier to look at.
@kevdiaz At what distance is the trade supposed to be closed?
@didymario7 That's weird. It should accept it with no problem. Can you please share the link to your project?
@od What do you exactly need from the video?
@xwhysquared It is obvious that the problen should be the indicator. Did you try values other than 7? Is that the only value that doesn't work?
@kallosh said in trade entry price value in a variable:
shared/rDC8pgs7c
The problem is that you are asking the loop to search for one only trade all the time whereas the check trades block is searchng for a different number:
That will never happen. You should remove that '1' number from all 'For each trade' blocks.
@doz Sadly the admin doesn't check his cryptowallet every day. Please send him a message letting him now here: https://fxdreema.com/contact
@xwhysquared The logic is correct. This means the problem is the combination of conditions to be met. Are you sure they are possible at the same time?
@ossy Blockis 29,30,31 and 32 need to be disconnected from its current position and then connected below a separated 'For each position' block.
@doz Are you a paying subscriber? If so up to 3 weeks. If you are a free subscriber there is no guarantee you will be send any reply.
@jaychyke I replied to your previous thread. Please don't duplicate threads.
