Posts made by l'andorrà

@migen No. You current disposityion is right. All calculations should be done before any trade is open. Is this the whole project or just a part of it?

@tradercompany Can you please share the link fo your project? On the other hand I see you are asking several aspects related to this project in other threads. Please can you focus on just one of them? That wil not disperse the information.

@tradercompany Not sure I fully understand what you mean. You can program a new pending orders as soon as a previous one is open. Is that what you mean?

@tradercompany You can create as many groups as you need. What do you exactly mean?

@xyon126 Then you can try this:

@tradercompany Not sure I fully understand you. I guess you mean you have a first pending order that is open as a trade. And then what that same open price as a new pending order? That cannot happen unless price is a few pips above/below that same price, depending on your broker conditions.

@homemebel Then you can try this:

@homemebel Martingales never work in the long run, but if you are still trying it, all your tree is fine. Just substitute block 19 for this one for a buy:

@ontrade You're welcome.

@wolamen You can use a boolean variable that is automatically set to false at 00:00 every day. And it is hold that way untill your condition is met. Then it is set into true. You launcher should have that condition on top of its tree. That way no more new trades will be open untill tomorrow.

@jzfusion You can do that by using condition blocks checking the balance atany moment and once any of those limits is cressed, a variable with your upper limit is modified.

@svengate That should work. Can you please share your project?

I'm testing how fibo works in fxDreema and I'm afraid I'm doing something wrong at a very basic level. I want to catch the price at 61.8% and I created this easy project just for testing:

https://fxdreema.com/shared/z68Rg8Wwe

However, I don't know why I only get the 0% level no matter what. Can someone please tell me what am I missing?

@mabz_h xyon126 is right. I remember that info was in his panel.

@khalids222 You're welcome, man

@ambrogio I'm afraid he's not anymore.:(

@ambrogio I'm afraid the admin is never in the forums. In my last email from him a few days ago he confirmed he's virtaully absent from all of them, sadly? The only way to get an answer is contacting him via the support page.

@mcvinbabas Ok. This means a pullback is (for a buy) a candle with it low below the MA and its close above it. This arises a new question, how many candles are supposed to pass from the initial crossing to the pullback? This is important because in both previous images I see previous crossing that are apparently ignored.

Please don't get me wrong. I'm not trying to be annoyingly picky. I want you to notice that an EA needs a generally long list of extremely precise list of conditions to be executed. What we humans see easily on a chart is not necessarily easy to implement in an EA.

@ralphy0 You're welcome.

@umbrellamaker You can get the same result without any additional calculation by using a 'Modify variable' block.