@aeivan What you need to do is creating two variables (not two constants) and position them in those same places the constants are now. Then you need a structure telling them when they are true or false, ie, what needs to happen for any of them moving from true to false and the opposite.
Constants can be selected by the user but can never change. However, variables can be modified, but cannot be chosen by the user.
@fm2020 I'm afraid this is advanced programmimg for me. 
Any other expert here?
@khalids222 Certainly a complex thing to implement. What are the grey 'custom code' blocks doing exactly?
@xyon126 Sólo se puede visualizar una de las imágenes. ¿Puedes volverlas a subir en enlaces separados, por favor?
@abel-poveda Las noticias fundamentales son las que hace mover el precio de forma brusca cuando aparecen publicadas. Pero ¿tienes alguna pregunta sobre fxDreema o has venido a hacer spam de dailyfx?
@xyon126 No deberías duplicar hilos, por favor. Ya te respondí con un ejemplo en el otro hilo.
@xyon126 Sure. Here you have this easy one:
Here you are working woth two timframes at the same time. The condition on top says that candle close must be above 20 SMA in H1 timeframe whereas the second one says candle close must be above 8 SMA in M15. Both conditions need to be true at the same time for a buy to be open.
@fm2020 Apparently you have defined two Constants or Variables called 'Lots' and 'SL'. We cannot see them in your link but they are there and the EA is trying to compile then and they cannot be found. Is this the whole project?
@sc8rpion Good for you. Omce you get your first sketch, please share it here to improve it.
@ambrogio Your current logic is designed in a way that 'For each closed trade' you want to buy a new trade. Is that what you really want? What of you have 100 closed trades right now. Will the EA open 100 trades?
@xyon126 Select the timeframe you want for each 'Condition' block inside its 'More settings' tab. You can combine as many different timframes as you need. However, be careful not to place those blocks in away that they can interfere each other.
@sc8rpion Well, apparently it is not an extremely difficult EA to do. However, I suggest to begin with a simplified version first and then adding more features. I would initally skip all those features like choosing session or scanning select pairs. Have you taken a look at the Instructions pages, btw?
@ramimoujaes I'll be glad to help you. Can you please share your current project to take a look at it?
@yazar-ilyas It depends on your current structure. Can you please share your project?
@xyon126 It depends on your current structure. Can you please share it?
@aeivan It will be much easier to understand if you share your project. Initially some of them should be Constants whereas other should be variables, but I prefer not to speculate until I can see it.
@anslembrath It is a martingale type strategy. It will not work on the ling run. Additionally 5 pips is a too short distance when considering slippage. I recommend you to focus on a different and les crappy strategy.
@doctorninja Do you have any initial project to begin with?
@krystian This is your project with blocks moved side to side:
All those blocks are wrongly connected. You are connecting white on top dots with orange down dots. That will never work. All connections MUST BE:
You are doing it just the other way round. Clearer now?