You are using different indicator for this. I don't have it, so I can't test it. But anyway, when you are using any custom indicator, check how it works with Trace first. Something like this: https://fxdreema.com/demo/mt4-trace-multiple And when you see that pink line, then you can use it. If it prints arrows here and there (not continuous line), then you can try to set Candle ID to 1 or more... it depends on the indicator.
This is what I made as an example: https://fxdreema.com/shared/kUibWj44 It works... kinda. I personally don't really see the need of this function if we want to close all trades into one. Because in the process we actually create new trades and it gets messy. I'm probably wrong, but I think that this function is to be used for 2 trades only, when they are known and there is a reason to turn them into one. I don't like what happens when we want to turn more than one trade into one.
there is a way, in fxDreema - My Indicators change the indicator's name to something like this: subfolder/indicatorname
Interesting, I wonder since when this is a problem. The problem is that some editor (tinymce) is not downloaded correctly, but I use the same editor in the Support/Contact page. Nobody told me that he cannot contact with me 
I fixed it
So, you think that the indicator doesn't work. You tested it with Trace block?
You know what, it turns out that I already wrote this code, but I never uploaded it. I remember that we were talking with someone about this problem some time ago and I wrote everything, but I forgot why I decided to not upload it. Well, I didn't rejected it as well, so now I uploaded it. I hope that I'm not missing something important and this will not break someone's rules.
Yes, it includes weekends. I think I can add some code to exclude the weekends, at least I can try.
No, the free version is not the problem. It depends on the indicator, try with Candle ID bigger than 0.
2 seconds and a half for just 1 tick? Are you sure?
So you are talking about the "Comment" blocks? They are actually 2 blocks. Did you tried them?
Because this situation is too special, I never wrote a code to check whether SL is different than "No Stop-Loss" when this particular MM is selected. This situation is only present in these blocks. For that reason I wrote this text over there, and also I think that the person who decides to use this MM should understand that he needs some SL, because this is the risk. You risk 2% of the money you have, meaning that is the trade is closed by SL, you will lose 2% of the balance. With no stop-loss, what is the risk... it is 100%.
But you are right that this is confusing to people, because few times in the past people had the same problem. But again, I think if someone uses this MM, he should understand that SL is a must.
Or... what did you expected from this MM to do? Because you probably intentionally selected it and then set SL to "No Stop-Loss".
I tested your project and didn't get any trade until I removed the Time filter block. Something doesn't look good in it:
Without this block the result looks like this for me:
Many transactions can happen when brand new buy or sell is immediately closed by "Close trades". I see that you have 2 of those blocks. Be sure that there is no logical way to run these blocks in the same ticks when "Buy now" or "Sell now" are running. In other words, the conditions above "Close trades" should be true only at the time when you want to close the trades, but not at the times when the conditions to create new trades are also true.
Richard, I can see that you don't like fxDreema, so I refunded your last payment (which is 6 months old, so I just sent you $100). And with that I surrender, I can't help you. I don't agree that my responses were insulting, I actually have this feeling that yours are, but this is not important. I can't help you, because I can't understand you. I told you this before - I can see your emails, I can see how much text you wrote to me and I can translate it, but I can't understand it. And it looks that I'm not alone, because here in this topic other people can't understand you as well. I really don't know what else to say.
I saw this picture before, but what it means really?
I can suggest to set the value of the indicator into a Variable, and then use that variable in the blocks.
There is a function with these parameters in MQL4:
bool OrderModify(
int ticket, // ticket
double price, // price
double stoploss, // stop loss
double takeprofit, // take profit
datetime expiration, // expiration
color arrow_color // color
);
You can see what can be modified, but the volume is not there
Ok, but when do you want to close them, at what rule?
What do you mean? I'm confused, because I'm not sure what you mean by comment. In the code, comment is something like this:
int abc = 1; // this is a comment
And in MT4 comment is the text up there on the left side.
I tried 1.3 instead of 2 and this is the result for EURUSD:
The problem is that there is something called Lot Step, which means that you cannot open 0.015 if the lot step is 0.01. You can only open 0.01 or 0.02, nothing in the middle. For bigger lot size, as it is in my example, it is more possible, you can see that 0.13 was possible. But if I set 1.25 instead of 1.3, it will not open 0.125 lots
The problem could be because Martingale looks at the lot size and profit of the last running trade, and if there are no running trades it looks at the last closed one. Why it looks at the last running trade? Because in the past someone asked for that. But to be fair, this is not a normal situation for Martingale. Martingale is a betting system that requires the bets to be finished, the trades to be closed. You double on loss. But if you have a running trade with unrealized profit/loss, then what is the right thing to do?