Best posts made by seb 0

@khalids222
I am a bit lazy helping you building this strategy, even it is not so complicated.
However I can give you my advice : I don't think strategies only based on distance between one candle and another are worth it. Because,

• no trend is supposed to last especially on the forex, in a way that if candle 0 > candle 1 the probability that the next candle is also above is close to 50%. 2 bull candles on H1 is an up trend on M5.
• And the probability of the price to reach a point is inversely proportionate to the distance between it and the start point, in a way that the probability of the price to go from 1.1500 to 1.1520 is 2 times lower than the probability to go from 1.500 to 1.510.

So the only utility(or one of the utilities) of fixing different levels of stops is to avoid the unluckiness of loosing an entire trade because of 1 pips, by spreading the targets into 2 or 3 stops to decrease the risk.
I would so add other indicators, more information to take in count in the strategy.

@ajmd97fx
Hey i think I think this is what you need to do

@ajmd97fx
Sorry i should have done this configuration
In yours you should reverse the "<" sign if you want the difference to be higher than X% of the Balance

@roar
Indeed it looks far to be excellent. Since it probably is slightly above 50% chance of winning I'm gonna invest some money I can loose while improving my strategy
Thanks for showing me i had a too narrow view of the picture!

@tt
Can you share your nonfunctional project please ?

@ambrogio
Does it work well ?
https://fxdreema.com/shared/VLlwtfnAc

@miro1360
Yes people tend to think making money is easier than it is

@cashflows
How can you evaluate the strategy win rate if you don't even know how to create one ?

@pintto
About how to build a specific strategy, I wouldn't follow the advice of l'andorrà posting a new topic everytime you face an obstacle.
Personnaly asking questions rarely helped me, and I finally ended finding the solution by my own. Hence as I understood the problem I was able to extrapolate it to any system of the same type. Still, the forum offers some start points, but avoid copy pasting.

About the strategies either you stuck to the conventionnel common trading style with mediocre-ok results at most, or you invest your time in learning scientific approches and more advanced strategies.

@Ads I see in the "big block" "Group 2" that the blocks 87 and 89 pass only if : Count_Trades_1<1, it might be the problem

I can also add that the martingale system:
in an average market situation, makes money which would not be the case not betting.
in a good market situation, makes less money than without betting, because you need to enter positions with little money due to the fact that the betting series must begin with very little bets.
in a bad market situation, makes you loose more money than without betting because it evolves exponentially.
There is then 2 worse situations an 1 better, just that the 1 situation(average) is applicable 2 times more often, on a random market.

@wolamen
I don't think you can because, it always is more advantageous to pay the same amount in 2 times, especially keeping the possibility not to extend.
The fact that the price per month is lower when the period is longer has the counter part that you commit paying for this longer period.