Well about "pattern rigid" EAs the parameters values impacts the results a lot. Let say a simple strategy that is : buy when rsi<30 and sell when rsi>70, can produce just by changing the parameters values : buy when -rsi<-70 and sell when -rsi>-30, which is the exact opposite and so both configurations can't be profitable simultaneously. Machine learning like EAs, could potentially remains profitable no matter the inputs parameters values, by inputs I mean feeding data. But then the parameters inherent to the structure of the learning process are of big importance because anyway the market follows accurate quantified rules. Finally I think a successful EA will always be better with parameters winning on training data, on test data, rather than with loosing parameters on training data, on testing data. Probably..
Posts made by seb 0
-
RE: Here, take this profitable eaposted in Tutorials by Users
-
RE: Here, take this profitable eaposted in Tutorials by Users
@roar
Ok, I personally use a custom criterion which is : recoveryFactoer*tradesNumber^tradesWeight, tradesWeight (0,1).
Do you mean that the learning process is incorporated in your EA, so you don't need to use the tester optimization anymore ? -
RE: Here, take this profitable eaposted in Tutorials by Users
@roar
Very cool, I probably wouldn't have invested on it by the 2017-2018 forward result, but with more hindsight the EA seems to hold very well on the long run.
What criteria do you/did you use for optimization ? -
RE: Tips for robustnessposted in Questions & Answers
@FxWRLD The spread is expressed in points, 5 points=0.5pip. It doesn't seem that high. How much was the spread for 2022 ?
Can I see the training and testing results ? -
RE: Tips for robustnessposted in Questions & Answers
@FxWRLD Unfortunately there is no universal tip to make an EA "more robust", any improvement depends on the strategy itself.
If your EA only makes profit on a few markets\timeframes\periods it is probably because it is not profitable at all. These winning periods might only be due to luck\conjecture.
Still you can look at the mql5 website, "articles" section, you will find a lot of "tips", even thought its not always easy... -
RE: Only 1 of 2 strategies within EA opens a tradeposted in Questions & Answers
@Ads I see in the "big block" "Group 2" that the blocks 87 and 89 pass only if : Count_Trades_1<1, it might be the problem
-
RE: Martingale principlesposted in Questions & Answers
@NZEFILI
I prefer staying on the forum, you can paste the link of your project so I can see -
RE: Martingale principlesposted in Questions & Answers
You will then need 2 other blocks than count how many losses happened after the start of the martingale series, and pass the block which uses the martingale after the 2 first losses.
But this "strategy" alone will still make you loose money. You should read this https://fxdreema.com/forum/topic/16093/what-you-need-to-know-about-trading -
RE: Question on arrays in fxDreema. Part 2posted in Questions & Answers
@l-andorrà
As you can see with this configuration my platform returns me only the tickets of the initial trades. Isn't it the case for you ?


-
RE: Question on arrays in fxDreema. Part 2posted in Questions & Answers
@l-andorrà
Ok I tried the things and I found that the feature "(in Loop)Trade\Order in loop" works out as it loads the ticket of the initial position, not the ticket of its last close.

-
RE: Question on arrays in fxDreema. Part 2posted in Questions & Answers
@l-andorrà
I didn't use these features a lot on fxdreema but, from what I see, what could be relevant to update your arrays values is not to create an other array "array_partial_close" .
Instead when a position is closed partially, you can update the "array_ticket_number" , and attribute a sub 1 number. Instead of replacing 1 by 0 as with a full close, replace 1 by 0.5, if the partial close is 50% of the initial amount.
So the value update will be : array_ticket_number[i]=array_ticket_number[i]-(volumeClose/initialVolume)
Is that what you want ? -
RE: My first MQL5 array doesn't workposted in Questions & Answers
@l-andorrà
Did you get these errors on fxdreema trying to export the project as .ex5 ? -
RE: Facing Compiling Errorposted in Questions & Answers
Might be a bug, I think it comes from block n°23, try deleting and recreating it.
If i may this "strategy" will much likely not work. -
RE: Looking for a good developer that can translate the ea to fxdreema.posted in Questions & Answers
@artteesgraphics
There is no detail about the strategy, and the available file is of .ex5 type which mean you cant decompile it and access the code. Did you think you could bypass the buying process of these products ? -
RE: ATR pipsposted in Tutorials by Users
@jstap
Nice coding, here is another way : https://fxdreema.com/shared/rp658QlZc -
RE: MT5 platform update, possibility of closing all positions at once, etc.posted in General Discussions
@l-andorrà I didn't think about that, it will then be a good news if you only want to manage a bucket of positions(manually). If you need something more and automate the whole, I don't know how trades management will become trough fxdreema.
Is there no MT4 update anymore ? -
MT5 platform update, possibility of closing all positions at once, etc.posted in General Discussions
Just to announce for those who hasn't noticed the new features of the MT5 platforms, you will probably be interested in reading this mql5 information page : https://www.mql5.com/en/forum/392425
-
RE: A Place to discuss, optimize and share profitable Ea's?posted in Questions & Answers
@facto
Ok, you always can download the project and test it on your broker I guess, it still looks a bit too traditional to me.
What kind of indicator is that ?