@jstap Something else I figured out, if the top block is comma separated e.g 1,2, then the connected trees can contain both group 1 & 2 providing it doesn't conflict.

Posts made by jstap
-
RE: Trying and failing to delete trades due to distance
-
RE: Trying and failing to delete trades due to distance
@l-andorrà So I jumped the gun in blaming my computer, this was not the problem, I found the problem though.
If your 1st block (No trade in this case) has an empty group number, and you 2nd and 3rd block (buy and pending sell, in this case) have a group number.
Then the EA will generate multiple trades, if all 3 blocks have the same number then it works as expected. -
RE: Trying and failing to delete trades due to distance
@l-andorrà So you learn new every day, so they say, well today I did.
It turns out that having too much happening with my computer caused the group problems.
Thank you, I think I can now get all working -
RE: Trying and failing to delete trades due to distance
@l-andorrà Interesting, I will ty again now, it is possible I had too much happening with my computer and it caused the problem.
-
RE: Trying and failing to delete trades due to distance
HI l'andorra, thanks for the reply, I have tried to add different groups but hundreds of trades are added so EA stops working.
I even made a simple version which you can see in the link, but it also generated hundreds of trades.
test project
If I am doing something wrong with this then advice is appreciated and maybe I can get it working. -
Trying and failing to delete trades due to distance
In this project every time a sell is created a pending buy is placed, this is then deleted if within a set distance of the already running buy trade, once this is working I will use as a condition to prevent placing trade. Without the (check distance--delete pending) the EA works as expected, but some trades are generated too close, with this condition all buy pending's are deleted straight away, regardless of the pips from existing trade.
Any help would be much appreciated.
-
RE: Question that hopefully some knows the answer to.
@jstap Ignore me, moved it back into the on tick area, made true in inputs and all worked.
-
Question that hopefully some knows the answer to.
On this project, when the trade button is pressed to stop trading, trailing stop also stops. Any idea why?
link to project: https://fxdreema.com/shared/MhsNoApFc)
-
RE: Only one pending buy placed on back test
@princeclaw Thank you, just saw your reply, the link is within the "link text" wording.
-
RE: Only one pending buy placed on back test
@l-andorrà Logically this would make sense , but when I have tried this it still continued to generate more than one order (that many the back test would crash), as you can see in the latest version I have added resetting the pass once block when trade closed or pending deleted seams to wor best.
-
RE: Only one pending buy placed on back test
An update from me.
- My computer doesn't like to run a back test on per tick.
- For some reason back test had to run for some time to generate sells.
- Now I have added an option to check if L1 & H1 is a bull or bear candle it now generates buys and sells, (I assume before when it tried to generate order, it failed due to SL & EN being on the wrong side for weather it tried to generate a buy or sell).
-
Only one pending buy placed on back test
This is the start of a multi conformation EA, on back test it places one pending buy, no sells and it doesn't place another buy once the 1'st is deleted. I don't think I have set this up wrong but maybe I have, any help on why this doesn't place a pending order at every previous L1 & H1 is much appreciated.
-
RE: Question about loop
@l-andorrà Thank you, this loop is very important to me, it will allow the EA to confirm whether pair is in a place of continuation of structure or needs break of structure, confirm whether the fibo lines up with entrance candle and so the TP is in the correct place.
I take it there is no chance of fxdreema inserting another block for loop with ID?
If I knew how to code I could probably create, I cant, I have someone that can create custom indicators so could probably handle this but he has no idea of how to start. -
RE: Question about loop
@l-andorrà So basically1st loop looks back finds indicator 1st blue buffer, ID is saved to V1, V1+1 is copied to V2, 2nd loop uses V2 to find indicator 2nd blue buffer ID and saves it to V3.
This means every time the buffer appears the previous buffer ID will move down the list, and this is repeatable for as many buffer positions as wanted.
-
Question about loop
is it possible to have loop start from a chosen candle ID? Maybe this could be made into a custom block? If so I have no idea how to do so and am assuming it would be quite difficult.
-
RE: I have two issues, maybe someone can help
@vishala: I will change and see what happens.
It is the ID I get, this works perfectly as the blue/red ID doesn't change for the current blue/red until its a few candles past it. -
I have two issues, maybe someone can help
How do I set pending order to cancel if price reaches the TP before pending is activated? I can't set to same condition as original TP as the buffer level will of most likely changed.
If I set risk to % of EN to TP the EA wont back test.
Thanks
-
RE: Question
I have now used Miro1360's amazing tutorial to use the standard ZigZag, the custom displayed slightly different on the chart, but this should suffice for now.
-
RE: Question
@l-andorrà thank you. I know how to get the previous candle dot value, getting a EA to find the previous dot is what I need, this could be the candle ID or price. I have tried for 3 days now and I do not think it is possible with the current available blocks.