Posts made by l'andorrà

Thanks for the info.

Do you have any initial project to begin with?

The trailing stop block needs to be separated from all other block trees. You should disconnect it from its current position and connect it below a 'pass' block on a separate block tree. On the other hand, the trailing order block is not necessary unless the trade is in loss, right?

Do you have any initial project to begin with?

You're welcome.

No hay una respuesta fácil para ello. En mi opinión, quitar el SL es peligrosísimo, porque nunca se sabe si el precio dará un salto que nos pueda hundir la cuenta. Creo que lo mejor sería aceptar que las pérdidas con el sistema actual son inevitables y reducir los lotes en su lugar. Tan sólo es mi opinión.

@Alan-paredes2 Interesante. No sabía esto. Gracias por el aporte.

Do you really need those lines? You just need the values of those high and low, right? You can use variables instead.

The only reasonable way to get that with fxDreema is finding a custom indicator doing that and then import it into your fxDreema account. Trying to do it with fxDreema would be a colosal effort.

@Jozef Please don't use this thread for your request. Open a new thread to do it and I will reply there.

@Ben-Romewel This is certainly a complex EA. It cannot be built with a few blocks. All those features need separate structure to build it, including variables. Are you familiar with using variables?

Those distances are extremely short. No broker will allow doing that on their terminal. You will definitely need to use higher distances.

Ok. And what do you exactly need? A new open trade every 20 pips from an initial trade? If so can you identify that initial one?

Can you please upload an image with a visual example. That would definitely help.

@Holly_grail Not sure I fully understand. Do you mean that both trades should be moved their SL to BE when 15 pips in profit are hit? Then you can do this:

I don't fully understand the second part. Should one of the trades be closed at 30 pips in profit while the other is not?

@facto But what's the point ion using twice the exact same condition? You can get the same result with one block only instead.

@vish That could do it but inly if you select a value of 2000% instead. If you do some research on the forum you'll find that this option need ridiculously high values to work correctly.

But do you mean that all trades will be closed will be closed at the same time and then, if the overall result is a loss, a new order will be immediately open? For example, if some buys and sells are closed and there was a loss, more buys and sells should be open again? I don't see the logic behind that.

Congrats!