Posts made by l'andorrà

En principio sí, pero depende de lo que quieras exactamente. ¿Cuál es tu estrategia?

Is that the only problem. Do all other features work correctly? I see block 29 is on/off selectable when no turn on/off blocks are present now.

Absolutely impressive! Congratulations.

This is one possible way, but not the only one. Substitute block 4 for this:

Just share you requests here. This is a general forum :).

I recommend you to read this:

https://fxdreema.com/forum/topic/2023/Adding-a-Sure-Fire-Hedge-to-an-Startegy/2

https://fxdreema.com/forum/topic/6624/problem-in-martingale

@l-andorrà said in I need a good programmer to help me:

I will be happy to help you. I sent you a private message.

Sure. I will be happy to help you. I sent you a private message.

I see this is an MT5 EA. That's not a good beginning. Do you have any variable/constant on your EA called 'digits'?

Empecemos con el bloque 4. Ahora mismo recibe dos condiciones de los bloques 3 y 7 y las deja pasar a los número 5 y 8. Tal como lo tienes montado ahora si la condición del bloque 3 es cierta, pasa al 4 que, si también es cierta, lo envia A LA VEZ, a los bloques 5 y 8. O sea, que se puede dar una compra y una venta independientemente de si vienen de las condiciones 3 y 7.

Te recomiendo que dupliques por completo ambas vías de compra y venta y las personalices. Una vez lo hayas hecho, hablaremos del segundo problema.

Honestle, remove all turn on/off blocks and use this structure (for buys only, you need to duplicate it for sells):

https://fxdreema.com/shared/fpYNtN5R

Let me know if it fits your EA.

Yor block 4 is working on candle ID 0. That's problematic when combined withs ticks, as is your case. Notice that your are asking for the bid to cross at this precise moment on and indicator that changes its value on every tick and with a spread that add smore difficulties on the executions.

I suggest you to consider the possibility of substitutung your tik condition by a M1 bar condition. That will avoid most of those problems.

@dastrade said in A condition for two bull bars...:

hi l'andorrà....are you italian?

No, I'm Andorran.

Could you please share your project to take a look on the possible reasons?

I can't imagine the problem just by seeing your tester. I need to see the project to guess why that distance is not respected.

Como último recurso, siempre puedes enviarle un correo directamente al administrador. Tarda mucho en contestar, pero si es un problema de mal funcionamiento de la plataforma, se lo mira seguro. A lo mejor el problema va por ahí. De todas formas, el hecho de que esté en formato ex4. lo fastidia todo. fxDreema no está pensado para trabajar con esa extensión. Lo siento.

This is crearly a great challenge for miro and/or roar :D.

What a pity. MT5 is a promising platform, but far away from being as stable as MT4.

Ok. Here you have my first suggestions:

1. All 'AND' blocks are unnecessary. Ther are designed to unite two upper blocks to a single o more further blocks. This is not your case. Just join your blocks one after another without any of those 'AND'. They are adding superfluous code to your EA.

2. What is the logic behind having those two on/off blocks? Honestly I think you cound simply remove them.

Please confirm this is what you want to do:

1. A buy/sell is opened.
2. When more than 100 pips or 50 € are achieved, close partially that order at a 50% size.
3. When conditions under block 29 are applicable, the order is closed.

What I don't understand what are you expecting the EA to do with all under block 123.

I would appreciate some additional info, please.

AFAIK only the last variable on your block (tic_o) can storage tock ID. All other above can't. Just hover your mouse on "Tick ID" and you will be provided with full info about how ticks are stored.

I can't see the project. Did you paste the whole URL?