Posts made by l'andorrà

I recommend you to send this bug to him personally. He's not as active on the forum now as in the past.

Could you please be a bit more specific?

I guess you already know this block:

But I also guess you already tried it and didn't work. Could you please share your project to see what conditions are applied?

I understand you mean two consecutive bull bars. If so, try this:

Ok. Could you please share again your latest version?

I'm afraid this EA surpasses my fxDreema knowledge, sorry :(. Maybe roar or miro would be able to shed some light on it.

@implosion said in MT5 Volume Percent based on stop loss:

Please Cancel. Found the problem. Not enough money.

That's a serious problem! LOL

Can you please share the new version to continue reviewing it?

@zxcsmith94 said in Closing trade based off different indicator:

You're referring to replicating the conditions where the first would be based off the cross of candle ID 1 and then the other pair of conditions would be based off the cross of candle ID 2?

No. What I mean is that all crossings should be defined as I suggested in order to avoid problem like the one you described.

Would you just do it for the crosses? Or for all the conditions do the same candle ID?

Initially for all crossings only. Then backtest it and if the problem persists, then all conditions should be treated the same way.

Do you see anything wrong with the closing perimeters? I have done the most basic form of closing indicators to test but I cannot seem to create the code to close at the right signal...

You closings are wrongly defined. Both blocks can close buys and sells at the same time. On block should close buys only and the other one sells only.

Hope it helps

I strongly recommend you to use the two step conditions crossing. One for candle ID 2 and the other for candle ID 1. IMHO this is the most efficient way to check for crossings.

Impressive! Congratulations. I have never seen so many blocks on the 'On timer' tab!!!

Blocks 15 and 8 reinitiate your ob variable every time blocks 2 and 5 are true. However, I can't see that indicator on your screenshot, so I'm not sure that is what you are looking for. Do you need that indicator conditioning your variable?

Indicator not uploaded. On the other hand, could you please share your project for a more detailed answer?

I will give you a hand, but you ask for many things at the same time. Let's do it step by step. Firstly, remove those old lonely blocks. Then renumber block 86 as number 1. Now it has a higher number that block 29 (if trade). That means that block 29 is the first one to be activated every tick.

Blocks 85 and 15 should be moved above blocks Asbuy and Ashsell. Not because they are wrognly posiotioned, just because logic will be more clear so.

Personally I would not turn on/off any block. Why do you want to do it? I think that is not necessary, IMHO.

@setsuna said in Once per trade doesnt work pls help:

@l-andorrà I use pendding order. Should i put delete pending order on the red or yellow. right next to the close trade?

If you don't need the 'Sell now' block you can simply substitute it for the pending order one. That will not change the way the EA works.

@setsuna said in Once per trade doesnt work pls help:

@l-andorrà my bad. I just change the new one with pending with closing like the picture before.
Futher more about the project there are a few question. There are two ID. 1 and 2. why is that. if you do that means trade two times. right?

I usually use two diferent condition blocks when defining crossings. I guess your crossing didin't work for this reason. If you do it as I suggested, you will be sure there was a crossing on candle ID 1. And no, there will not be two trades, just one.

Technically yes, but notice that @fxDreema said his project does not break the loop, so you will have to do it.

Ok. You can begin with something like this (for sells only):

https://fxdreema.com/shared/FIFL1NOkb

First two questions.

1. Why are blocks 81 and 130 unconnected? I guess you know lonely blocks don't work.
2. What's the logic behind turning on/off the profit under 100 pips only?

Exactly, I already knew the logic of the indicator. I was interested in what isp00rt said. Once again I can confirm that Mq5 is not as interesting as mq4 when designing EAs on fxDreema. Programming knowlegde is required to be fully functional. Sad:(

Thank you once more for your help, Miro.