Posts made by ramsay09

No, thanks restoring became obsolet. I already have realized what you have wrote I have to note. Importing an old version from my HD was not removing problems. Therefore I have to mirror all my EA versions to my hd more frequently.

I would like to use the desktp builder but importing my current projects is not possible. I think it is necessary to make both version equal (browser and desktop). Couldn't you do that as early as the browser version is stable. In that case I (and probabely everyone) could work on an stable version and not on an experimenting platform like the browser version unfortunately but obviousely is.

Nevertheless fxdreema is growing and becomes better and better, but...

p.s. where did you have posted or are you posting an upcoming experimental phase. I have to keep an eye on those postings.

By the way happy new year...

the errors mentioned in my last post are gone.

That is not the reaseon I want you to add the backup (two days back) of my EA "Grid-EA full-auto v1.3". There is something strange with the buy/sell blocks and the formulas.

Since today morning I have multiple errors in the following kind piece of code:

else if (ModeOutput == "id_by_visible")
{
int VisibleShift = 0;
int VisibleID = 0;
int VisibleLimit = 100;

	if (VisibleLimit == 0) {VisibleLimit = Bars;}
	
	int vid = 0;

There are 80 errors involving the same kind of code. Please look over my current EAs: "Grid-EA full-auto v1.3" and "Grid-EA SR full-auto v1.1".

Well... fxdreema, I think this strategy is a range breakout trend following strategy and the only disadvantage is that the EAs range is not cerrectly adapted to the true current market range. If it is possible (I will try to do that) this strategy could become very interesting.

If someone don't want to take a loss on false breakouts and the stop los is the opposite range border, the sequence 1, 3, 6, 12... is correct. If someone prefer 1, 2, 4, 8... or even less, the result will be that EA/strategy need more pips to get into profit to close all trades. That will decrease the propability to close all trades and increase the propability to get trapped into a range and get a margin call or to get high draw downs.

You have to think in the category of position mangement. If you will do so you will see that it is completly irrelevent to close the opposit position. What counts is the net lot size in the wished direction. 1 -1-2 = (-2); -2 + 6 = (+4); +4 -12 = (-8); -8 +24 = +16; ...
So if you don' t want to take a loss on false break outs and want to close the oposit trade, you need the sequence 1, 2, 4, 8, 16.
A lower increase of sequence will implies that EA/strategy need more pips to come into profit.

This is what the strategy "told" to me :).

But anyway, this strategy is not very profitable and I prefer martingale against trend strategies.

I don't like indicators, actually and I use them as rare as possible but if you give me a clear specification similar to the sure fire strategy and it looks interesting I will try to create an EA.

Some time ago someone asked somewhere in this forum how to create the sure fire strategy according to the attached pdf.

I was also interested how this strategy is working on backtest therefore I have created it and want to share it with the people here in this forum. I don' t know if all blocks are "politically correct" used but the strategy is working as specified.

Maybe you can extract a part of it and add it to your examples and maybe it will help some newbies as I was one and sometimes still are one.

The Sure Fire and Double Martingale EA:
https://fxdreema.com/shared/CKttiqaec

......
AWESOME-Forex-Trading-Strategy-(never-lose-again).pdf

Could add the 5 day old backup of "Grid-EA full-auto v1.0" as "Grid-EA full-auto v1.0_backup" don't replace "Grid-EA full-auto v1.0" just add the renamed file. I have to compare the EAs.

Ok. You have backups for the last 5 days, that's nice. Next time I will wright you to restore the broken EA. That's "sounds" good.

No, I don't use the Desktop version but just the Browser version. Could malware affecting the browser version in some way? Should I thake Browser Protection SW or something like that? What SW is working unproblematic with fxdreema (maybe some freeware)?

Unfortunately the past of the history was not big enough to restore EA but it is ok I took a previouse version .

Which block do you mean: "Formula" or "Modify Variables" could you give me a screen shot where I can see how it should looks like.

Then I have a problem after restoring changings on my EA "Grid-EA full-auto v1.0". Variables and Constants wasn't touched by me. please look over the following blocks:

1, 2, 80, 81, connected a sell block to 958 (but deleted again) connected a buy block to 959 (but deleted again).

Before I touched these blocks everything was ok. Some of these blocks are very old 1 year+. I don't know if that matters but I have opened two old EAs 1 year+ before. Are the blocks of old EAs always up to date?

p.s.
I have found malware on my pc. Maybe that is the reason for the problems. How malware can affect the builder? I am working only with the browser version.

Yes but where and how to use them? An example please.

thanks, int is working fine. Now I would like to surpress negativ values. There is fabs() or I could use a condition block but is there something like int. I would like to have 0 or a positiv value.

how to cut the after-point numbers of a variable. The value is from a formula. Integer as typ is not working. I want values like 146 and not 146.38762947.

Well, I can understand you, I also don't like indicators except kind of MA's and their use to detect divergences is Ok. The added "indicator" is composed of indicators (I think, but don't know that exactly) but SR itself is acutually not an indicator. To add a kind of "indicator" or a block that provides similar or better results like the indicator I have attached here will be a very very helpfull tool for all Traders and EA builders. But I don't know how complex it is to make that and maybe I have to buy that SR-indicator (the attached one crashes an W1 and MN1).

......
PZ_SupportResistance_W1_error.ex4

Thanks. I think I discard that indicator for my EA.

Is it possible to create support and resistence indicator (drawing SR-lines) like the attached one. I think these kind of indicators are composed of zig-zag and fractal indicators.
What I need are SR-lines which are the same on all thimeframes and which are not move/change. Actually the same behaviour like manually added hozizontal lines in mt4. These lines are from 1min to MN1 chart the same and on the same position.

......
U_MTF_SRTrend1.ex4

I have attached the indicator. The buffers are appearing to me to be not sufficient but maybe you could find out how this indicator could work on EA.

In case there is only the .exe data of an indicator available it is not possible to backtest EA with the objects the indicator is providing on live account?

......
SS_SupportResistance_v07 (1).mq4

Is that backtestable? As I have understand you right the Indicator is just providing the objects but is not added to EA. Of course I will add indicator to chart on live demo/real account.

Do I have to add indicator somewhere and somehow to EA?

There is a "indicator is visible" block, is that block necessary to make functionality working?

I have the below. What have I to add to make funktionality backtestable?

......
screenshot1.jpg

I think I have understand your instruction and will implement it later but I don't know what two prices you mean. Is it Price 1 = ask and Price 2 = bid or what prices do you mean?

There are manny object but EA should always take the object that is closesd to the market. The first object the market is hitting is always the right/correct one. As long as market is within the coloured rectangle condition should be true/open otherwise false/closed.

I would like to place orders while market is inside of a coloured rectangle (Indicators buffers are not suitable).

There is something like "pick object by ..." .

Could you give me an example how to do the following:

while market is inside of a specific coloured rectangle (for example: red) a condition block or something similar should be executed to drive a buy or sell block. There is no name just the colour.

......
screenshot.jpg

Thanks, everything is working correctly again.

I have taken a direct connection by a "Pass" block and maybe I have forgotten to connect a flag with all necessary blocks but our postings about that issue were definitely helpfull.