Posts made by RGoo

@RGoo ......

deleted...

@roar
Thank you very much, a very useful tip, I also had this problem occasionally.

@Mitchp

Here it is better to use candle "1" because candle "0" is also the market price, although not the middle one but it could be due to such a constellation.

@Cybust
Interesting thought, I quickly put something together for you, take the DAX 40 from 2023 with this setting, that should work, what do you do with it, what is the strategy

https://fxdreema.com/shared/OWJt2e11e

@jstap yes, it could be, it was just a way of thinking

@Khun-Som-Ath
Ok, to do this you first need the BE, then you can add your TP to this. Here is a link with which you can calculate the BE SEPARATELY for buy and sell positions. You can also calculate the BE for both together, but that is more complicated.

https://fxdreema.com/shared/RJCz148ud

@jstap
thanks, it worked

@jstap , @sktsec
Thank you for the answers, I forgot to write that I don't need the current time frame to be displayed, but rather a time frame that I have stored in the constants. So I would always like to know which time frame my indicator refers to in the current time frame. Here are some pictures, all the code wouldn't be helpful.

Hello, does anyone know how I can display a timeframe value entered in the constants in the display? FxDreema doesn't know the TimeFrameToString(TF) function and returns an error message.

If I haven't written the code myself, it's always difficult to judge it, so if I write that in my opinion one thing or another is wrong, don't take it too seriously, I could be wrong. OK, but I think there are some errors in your code or things that shouldn't be done that way. 1. for "Check trades count" with your input, use "if trade" , the block "pass" is unnecessary at this point. Read the instructions for fxdreema carefully, everything important is in there. Now to the most important thing: are you sure that your indicator outputs a color value? I can't imagine that, but I can't help you with that either because I don't use MT4. The "delay" block is also unnecessary, what do you want to do with it? You use it when you can better observe a process in the strategy tester or for very specific things in the code, but not without an important reason.

It is not so easy to explain why we overvalue an action after the "close" price of a candle. But I want to try to make a simple thought. The closing price only says that at the time when the time for this candle was over it had this value. Not more! So if buyers of a position had bought a little later, the closing price would be different. If the candle didn't last 5 minutes, but 5 minutes and 30 seconds, the price would be different. The highest and lowest prices in a unit of time are much more important. The only influence is that some traders pay attention to opening and closing prices and of course influence them.

@AlexisC25

In most cases it is not wanted that the EA only checks the conditions once at the beginning of the new candle. Often it is wanted that several positions are not opened in a row. To do this you have to do this "once per candle" directly in front of the buy or sell order set

@Ideal
Martingale is only dangerous when coupled with greed. A Martingale strategy can also be designed in such a way that the maximum decline does not blow up your account, so limiting the positions is the right thing to do.
Limiting trades is a very simple thing that can be found in the database, but ok, here's an example.

@Julianrob
I see, smart idea.

I find the strategy very interesting and promising because it is based on an event that is more than 50% likely, which means you can easily count on it. However, I don't exactly understand the approach to testing the EA in a forward strategy. A forward strategy can only be based on the events of the past, so what exactly makes a program in a forward strategy better? Is an assumed dynamic development taken into account here? So trends that change exponentially or what is the difference and especially the advantage, can someone help me?