Topics created by David197

Hello???

Is this an error?
Could you check it?

Thank you,

I think that this was my idea when I made this block - to put that parameter to Custom Price Level and then for SL and TP to select Custom Price Level as well. When SL and TP are set to Custom Price Level, the "Price relative to" option is useless anyway, so that third option was only there to say that SL and TP are custom levels. It's a little bit confusing, I know. But I now added the "missing" parameter, you can try it.

So there are 2 main ways to select objects - by name (because each object has unique name) or by searching/filtering (loading each object and checking if it is what we want). The first way you can do in "Condition" directly. The second way is with using this "For each Object" block. I guess that you can't use the first way, so you should use "For each Object". I don't know why it is not working for you, but if you can give me more details and even a small project for an example... I need to know what you are doing exactly and what the goal is, so then I can test it here and see what is the problem.

Ok, I think it's pretty clear...

Let's say, if connected to Every tick, the block for each object will iterate to check every object on every tick.

Thank you!

Looking at the code, I think that this "Flilter by pending type" parameter in the "trades" block is there for nothing, it is unused. But in fact these blocks exist from the very beginning (for years) and I'm a little bit afraid to touch anything in them 🙂

Do you have an example? Sometimes the problem is not in the block you think, but in the way you connected it. I guess that many people are using those blocks and I don't remember complains about them lately, so I think that in general they work properly.

I also think that it's better to have some Condition block that checks whether some Variable equals to true/false or 1/0... or something else.

If you have fully disconnected blocks, they are excluded from the output file. In your case this will happen, I believe. The EA generator does not check the contents of the Run block. And so many blocks to turn on/off... I think it's too much and you are doing something in the worse way.

Just in case, if you have a group of blocks and you want to prevent that group of blocks to work, it's enough to turn off only the block on the top (if there is only 1 block on the top). If the block on the top doesn't have the chance to pass, then the blocks below will never pass, even if they are not disabled.

Hello,
I still have 2 questions:

how can the ID be a string and also be used to sort the execution of the blocks?

and, does the AND block add a significant amount of load to the processing of the EA?

Thank you,
David R.

@david197

I had the same problem. What you will have to do in the adjust box is put +ConstantName pips just like you did with +banda_arriba pips, but in your constants value box, only put a value such as 15. If I were to guess, you are putting pips in the value box after your number. I hope this helps 🙂

0_1511705779713_07954f71-e35f-4cc6-8b11-68b5f787956e-image.png

@ellemitless You can do it this way:

01.png