Posts made by RGoo

@laudable222
Please upload an image with the error message.

@nicholasweber86
You have to test one condition after the other.
I have created a help for you to do this.
In the comment you can see that your EA only gets to the first condition.
Now you have to move the control block further and further until you know with which setting all conditions are fulfilled.
Of course, you can also use only one control block.
Also, no order is smaller than 10. Here you only need one block.
In your current setup, the EA would open a position with every tick if the conditions are fulfilled. You have to prevent this.
Attention! The display is in black letters. If you use a black background, you must choose a different colour.

https://fxdreema.com/shared/ybLI3kZxb

@gbhforex

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qmKxo7nIlYI

@zedeai2
You have to be a bit more specific.
According to what you have explained, it would be enough to position the order blocks as below,
but that is probably not the problem.
And the objects should get a string variable and better not start with a number. (see example)

https://fxdreema.com/shared/oLj4zDyP

@jjtrader
The interesting thing about programming is that there are many ways that lead to the goal and you can program almost everything easier. I have determined a much simpler way.

Even without an exact start, the EA keeps its head above water. Your strategy seems to be quite good.

You can remove the display, that was only for control.
The BE could also be helpful, but you can also delete it.

https://fxdreema.com/shared/Poq5jqbBd

deleted because of update

@jjtrader

deleted because of update

@sopzen
Sorry, that was not for you, but for "mcvinbabas".
I thought "mcvinbabas" had written.

@sopzen
Have you considered that this is a loop function?
If the block is triggered once, it outputs the desired number of pulses.
So the block does not only pass x pulses!!!
Here is an example.
https://fxdreema.com/shared/2afQl9mG

@jjtrader
I have improved it once again. When the old trade is closed, the younger one becomes the oldest.
Well, logic should be treated just like a woman, always careful and think beforehand what you want to do.

https://fxdreema.com/shared/Mdp76oeIb

@jjtrader
Do it the way the broker asks. Close the oldest trade first. If you want to open several "double" trades, it will be more difficult.
Here is a small suggestion, but I have not tested it and not completed.

https://fxdreema.com/shared/tmRWJYH7d

@jstap
Let's see, a third party sometimes recognizes the error faster. And believe me, there is always a mistake ..... you just don't see it. That's why people think it's a system error.

@mcvinbabas
If the block does not work, then you have an error in the rest of the program. This means a logic error.

@jargonloq
This is then most likely due to your indicator. With the "control counter" you can check if the indicator shows the condition as fulfilled. The counter must increase. However, in order to use your own indicator, you need to know a little more about how to use fxdreema. You should study the fxdreema page carefully beforehand.

https://fxdreema.com/shared/gt9nF8h0d

@jargonloq
https://fxdreema.com/shared/P1nMlgPye

@jargonloq
https://fxdreema.com/documentation/builder/things-not-to-do

@ontradingx
Have you considered that the swap is included in the profit?
So if you close the positions with 0 profit you have already earned the swap.

If you want to add the single values, you have to do it a bit differently.
I have attached an example for you.

https://fxdreema.com/shared/gnx81rRX

The function "==" is usually used only for a boolean function. Because your indicator would have to have exactly the desired value at the moment it is queried, that is very unlikely. You can use " x> " or only " > ". But in the 2nd case you have to limit the number of purchases. Because as long as the condition is fulfilled, with each tick would be bought. The condition " once per bar " could be used for this.

https://fxdreema.com/shared/F3VISevKb

@egaxme
Ok, I see, but in this case I can't help you then.

@egaxme
I just watched the video again, which I had linked to you. I'm afraid you didn't mean that kind of martingale solution. That was my mistake. In the Boxxocode video series, the martingale variant is often used directly in the buy block and this is what I wanted to show you. It will be the best if you briefly describe how the EA should work. Here is a picture of the use of the maringale in the buy block.
Please keep in mind that the maringale strategy can be very dangerous. Your indicator must definitely create more hits than errors even without M strategy. If not, you can also roll the dice and the M strategy would bring the same result.