It is unknown because I'm rarely advertising it. One of the reasons for this is that I think I will not be able to support many users at once. But surprisingly enough for me, there are 1-5 people registering every day "by chance" and I feel good with that.
Take a look at that "Group" parameters in each trading block, such as No trade, Buy now, Trailing stop, and so on
https://fxdreema.com/help/working-with/magic-start-and-groups
I guess something is wrong, but this Shoutbox is a plugin for the forum and to be honest I'm a little bit scared to touch those things in this forum. I was having hard time to configure all the relative links properly in the beginning 
Indicators communicate with EA's via buffers, and buffers are simply holders of values. No more than 8 buffers for an indicator are allowed. Those buffers can represents OR NOT the objects drawn by indicator (lines, arrows, histograms and others)
Normally, if the indicator is written with all the best rules, each object of the indicator will be represented with it's own buffer. If there is a line that shows value 55 on the screen, then there will be buffer named like "LineBuffer" with the same value of 55. As we already know, EA's can read buffers, they does not search for objects actually.
An indicator can show line, histogram, arrow or other objects. While the line is normally continuous with each value very close to the others, arrows are not the same nature. Arrows are either exists or not exists. So, in case there is a buffer that represents arrow, while the arrow is visible, the buffers holds value of the level where the arrow is positioned - price value like 1.2683. But, when we have no arrow on chart, what is the vaule inside the buffer?
Buffers that represents signals drawn by arrows normally holds a value like the price level where the arrow is located. And there are many possible variants when there is no signal/no arrow. In such case the buffer can be 0, 2147483647 or negative value like -1. Why is that? It depends on how the indicator is written, it depends on the developer's work. But in order to work with that indicator, you MUST know what happens in it's buffers.
As I said before, buffers can represent objects, or can return values that are no "visible". And it's not that rare situation where you can find an indicator with broken buffers, where you will not find any logical meaning in what the buffers says. This can happen if the indicator is written by someone, then updated from another one who is not as good programmer as he believes he is.
%(#FF8000)[Now, to make things a lot easier I just made a new block named "Levels tester (for indicators and more)". Use it to check custom indicator's buffers when you are not sure what values they hold. You will be able to see values as a line and actual numbers. Use this in "Visual mode" of course.]
By "Demo" you also mean live, not backtesting? Do you have error messages?
Oh, I think I know why this happens and I will go to fix it now. It may take a while.
For projects with only few blocks it might generate bigger files than before, but for bigger projects it makes them smaller. But it was not only because of the size, MetaTrader does not complain when an EA is megabytes. In general, it's better when a code is written in OOP style and I wanted to do that for a long time. Although, now that I did that, I can't say that I really like this style, it's probably even harder for somone to understand what is going on in the code.
Well, managing risk is too general, you better explain what you mean
Each EA creates some trades on the same account, so each EA uses the same source of money. But EAs are separated by something called Magic Number. Basically when an EA creates a new trade, it gives particular Magic Number to that trade... and all trades that it creates. Then when it want to let's say delete a trade, it will only see those trades with it's own Magic Number and should not touch the others.
To be honest, I'm a little bit skeptic... it looks to me like just another fancy stuff around that can be described as "doing same thing in another way because it's cool to be different"
You want to try this formula because you really get it or because you saw the chart on the bottom of the page?
@tristyfinance, it's not even dollars, I changed it to EUR. Well, cryptos still appear in USD, but in the past I gave extra 10% to everyone who used crypto anyway.
So there is a problem with small payments - transaction fees. In PayPal for example, there is a fee of 3.49% plus additional fixed fee. That fixed fee is either 0.39 EUR or 0.49 USD. Here are more details:
https://www.paypal.com/us/webapps/mpp/merchant-fees
This is actual example from some of the latest payments I've got:
The fees are usually even bigger than 3.49% + 0.39. I don't know why, but for example, for 23 EUR the fee should be 0.8027 + 0.39 = 1.1927. But it's 1.48 for these particular payments. This is 6.43%.
Let's say there is a payment of 5 EUR. Then, the minumum fee would be 0.1745 + 0.39 = 0.5645. This is 11.29% of the payment at least.
So you see that I would rather remove the lowest price than adding even lower one. I'm not going to remove it of course, but I'm trying to explain my way of thinking about this
Yes, I posted two sample files above. It's ok to write all the parameters, name the file as the name of the indicator and upload it to fxDreema. Also you have to put the number of buffers and optionally give them names. This is not so different as if there is an option to manually create list of parameters directly in fxDreema.
No. I personally don't like any form of advertising, I don't understand it and I just can't think of this
Sometimes there are extensions in the browser that prevent some of the .js scripts. I don't know exactly why. I wrote pretty much all .js files used in fxDreema and they generally work, but there are extensions that for some reason don't like something in the code.
The last situation - some Norton extension prevented one of my scripts saying that some frames are not allowed... but when I look into the code I don't see any frames (iframe or something related). So even I am confused
Sorry, I don't work as a personal programmer and I don't want to. Well, you can always find one over the internet. I also don't care about anyone's strategies, but I'm here to support fxDreema itself and to answer questions about how to work with it.
I know it's not easy sometimes, because in order to create a strategy, you must build it logically, after all this is a program and it does what the programmer tells it to do in appropriate language. Here - in the language of some blocks and variables. So, no MQL needed, but the language of logic is mandatory.
I can recommend you to open MetaEditor and start learning MQL4. I think you have time to do that, and I'm sure it will boost your knowledge and potential. And it's also fun. You will not be the next great programmer, but it's good just to understand basics, to feel the EAs, and this can happen for about 1 month I believe.
I will check this block. I made some updates on many blocks lately, maybe I added some bug... or it was there for a long time
Group number is part of Magic number (Magic number = Magic start (found in input options) + Group) and if you will complicate the project... I don't recomment complications. At least everything that I'm trying to do is to simplify things.
If you want to differentiate trades by symbol, use in trading blocks (such as "On trade is running") "Specific market" option, not "Any market".
Fixed. I copied some code from my local fxDreema, but I didn't noticed that the names of some parameters were different. I renamed those parameters in my local version and eventually I will rename them in the web version
There are no conversion blocks, but the native MQL4 functions are not hard to use:
http://docs.mql4.com/math/mathabs
MathAbs(3-5) should give you 2.
