Posts made by seb 0

Hmmmm... right lets let Zackry choose the project he prefers

@miro1360
I'm not sure this is correct
Conditions in block 15 and 16 can not be filled but, what Zackry want to be true, be true.
wick3<wick2<wick1 isn't necessary in this case.. or I didn't understand @Zackry well.
Test your EA then mine they dont have the same results.

Now works perfect https://fxdreema.com/shared/gk5Bhv8I
@Zackry

Then don't start from 0 roar, I'm struggling on it since i a bit of time haha
This is what i've done until now, still not perfect tho, it is trickier than I thought
https://fxdreema.com/shared/u8Vmm79Dc

@roar
Yes I forgot to mention that all studies I found have been made on stock markets, I don't really know why. But in "normal" periods a bigger volatility is better indeed.

@sjthetechguy
Duno this work fine on my broker : https://fxdreema.com/shared/5dynQn8Mc
Can I see you project ?

The cost of trades isn't necessary lower when the volatility is high though(not relatively). The ask-bid size depends on the liquidity of the asset, which is the number of buyer and seller, and their balancing. In very high volatility moments, the market is often in a imbalance order position, meaning that there are way more sellers than buyers or vice versa. The ratio spread/price fluctuation can then make it worth or not, depending on the size of the fluctuation. That's why studies tend to show that trading algorithms are less present during event days/big return days.
source : https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0927538X20302201?via%3Dihub

@sjthetechguy
I suppose when you say "into a variables" you mean "into 3 variables". Then if there is one TP by position, this structure should work :
https://fxdreema.com/shared/dSH5jSMXd
Needs confirmation tho.

@siggi12345
Its ok you are discovering how things work. I my self didn't know about this block, I never use it.
Your welcome

@siggi12345
Hum, what you mean by "single candle template" ?
Doesn't the condition block do the math ?

Yeah, the shape of that performance curve is particular tho. On such a low periodicity, patterns are different. Maybe that's because the spread is too important compared to the potential price movement to take profit from it, so a few people participate to maintain these patterns.

@savagetrades
I dont see any pic there, only the link

@l-andorrà
I think you are just using fibo parameters wrongly. As you can see fibo levels are between 0 and 32. It is the ID if each level, not the value it self. So if the reference level is 100%, try to set : Property = price by level ; Fibonacci level = 6.
Level 100 doesn't exists thats probably why it returns a 0 value.

@khalids222
Hum like that then ? https://fxdreema.com/shared/wocIhsRE

@ambrogio
Well i just noticed that the proportion of one pip can be different from one instrument to another. On currencies the pip unit, is the unit of the 5fth digit, no matter if the price is 1 or 100, because it is proportionate to it. Also on some stock assets the pip unit is the unit of the 5fth digit (like Apple). So i thought we just had to divide the price by 10.000 to get the pip unit ( USDJPY = 105,555 => 105,555/10.000 = 0,0105555 ) then the pip unit is the unit of the first digit, here 0.01. But the pip unit of others like Blackberry is third digit so.. That's weird thinking tho haha

@ambrogio
It would have been simpler to take as pip, the first digit of the price divided by 10.000 ^^

@ambrogio
Didn't know about that -.-

@yoloyacht
If it doesn't work only with this instrument, check the minimal volume allowed in specifications, if it is more than 0.1 that should be the reason.

@khalids222
By what you write, you are telling that R1 and R2 are both equals to 0, doesn't make lot of sense to me.

@khalids222
From what i got,
if : BUYUNDERZERO < 0 => BUYUNDERZERO = R1
if : BUYABOVEZERO > 0 => BUYABOVEZERO = R2
Is that it ?